Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6241 - 6250 of 83338 for civil case no. "90-77".

Kevin A. Laufer v. Town of Merton
for reconsideration. The court dismissed the action at the conclusion of the Laufers’ case, finding that they had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14080 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Kevin A. Laufer v. Town of Merton
of the Laufers’ case, finding that they had not established a proper measure of damages. The Laufers argue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14080 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
, P.J., Hruz and Seidl, JJ. Warren Slocum has again appealed the same underlying case. Based upon
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185294 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Kirk Ennenga
: [A] case like this, I guess, can be considered every judge’s nightmare. That is, to act to remove
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15011 - 2017-09-21

Wisconsin Court System - eFile/eCourts
justices Calendar Livestream courts Famous cases Visiting Court of Appeals Function Fees & filing Judges
/news/view.jsp?id=1573

Wisconsin Court System - eFile/eCourts
justices Calendar Livestream courts Famous cases Visiting Court of Appeals Function Fees & filing Judges
/news/view.jsp?id=1594

Wisconsin Court System - eFile/eCourts
justices Calendar Livestream courts Famous cases Visiting Court of Appeals Function Fees & filing Judges
/news/view.jsp?id=1597

State v. Jene R. Bodoh
. This is a dog bite case. The twist is that this case does not come to us under the civil liability statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12104 - 2005-03-31

Paige K.B. v. Louis J. Molepske
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 96-2620 Complete Title of Case
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17154 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
possibility the error contributed to the outcome of the case. Therefore, we reverse and remand for a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34279 - 2008-10-14