Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6241 - 6250 of 50063 for writ of certiorari forms.

[PDF] State v. Eugene Henry Jensen
for writ of habeas corpus in the circuit court. See State ex rel. Rothering v. McCaughtry, 205 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6323 - 2017-09-19

Mary Sevcik v. Secura Insurance
for a supervisory writ to compel the clerk of the trial court to return the record to the supreme court for review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5921 - 2005-03-31

State v. Larry W. Echols
Finally, in 2001, Echols petitioned this court for a writ of habeas corpus, alleging that appellate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24799 - 2006-04-17

[PDF] CA Blank Order
With this action, Vega also filed a petition for writ of mandamus in the circuit court seeking records from
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=651538 - 2023-05-02

State v. Eugene Henry Jensen
argues that this claim should have been raised by petition for writ of habeas corpus in the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6323 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Larry George v. Lin Mechler
dismissing his petitions for writs of mandamus in two public records cases.1 The issues are whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7812 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Larry George v. Grace Brown
dismissing his petitions for writs of mandamus in two public records cases.1 The issues are whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7813 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Stephen W. Jones v. Eleanor Swoboda
appeals from an order substantially denying relief on his petition for a writ of mandamus. Jones
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9673 - 2017-09-19

Stephen W. Jones v. Eleanor Swoboda
. Stephen Jones appeals from an order substantially denying relief on his petition for a writ of mandamus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9673 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Larry W. Echols
for a writ of habeas corpus, alleging that appellate counsel was ineffective for failing to argue that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24799 - 2017-09-21