Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6251 - 6260 of 12471 for mr.
Search results 6251 - 6260 of 12471 for mr.
[PDF]
State v. Scott A. Magnuson
with the recommendations and also with what Mr. Collins has stated.” During his allocution, Magnuson expressed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13253 - 2017-09-21
with the recommendations and also with what Mr. Collins has stated.” During his allocution, Magnuson expressed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13253 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
letter. The court further ordered, “Should Mr. Goodpaster file any more motions to permit contact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191278 - 2017-09-21
letter. The court further ordered, “Should Mr. Goodpaster file any more motions to permit contact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191278 - 2017-09-21
Alfred Riveria v. Lawrence Johnson
that was in effect during the relevant time period. Mr. Johnson contacted Partners Mutual immediately upon receiving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8069 - 2005-03-31
that was in effect during the relevant time period. Mr. Johnson contacted Partners Mutual immediately upon receiving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8069 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was filed, Terry filed a “Motion to Dismiss Charges with Prejudice” in which he stated: “On 4-28-12, Mr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107360 - 2017-09-21
was filed, Terry filed a “Motion to Dismiss Charges with Prejudice” in which he stated: “On 4-28-12, Mr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107360 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Anita Lusk
argues that “[w]e cannot proceed in this system on some oral statement that Mr. Reynolds purportedly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14394 - 2014-09-15
argues that “[w]e cannot proceed in this system on some oral statement that Mr. Reynolds purportedly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14394 - 2014-09-15
State v. Robert Feiner
, this is not a situation, either, where the maximum potential prison sentence is warranted given Mr. Feiner’s age
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6231 - 2005-03-31
, this is not a situation, either, where the maximum potential prison sentence is warranted given Mr. Feiner’s age
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6231 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to a statute of limitations defense. Counsel stated, “Mr. Zareczny is aware that he is receiving the benefit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=125547 - 2017-09-21
to a statute of limitations defense. Counsel stated, “Mr. Zareczny is aware that he is receiving the benefit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=125547 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
in this case on July 14, 2023, state: “Mr. Jackson withdraws request to vacate the judgment in Dane County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=958770 - 2025-05-16
in this case on July 14, 2023, state: “Mr. Jackson withdraws request to vacate the judgment in Dane County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=958770 - 2025-05-16
COURT OF APPEALS
for protection in the community from Mr. Phoudavong.” The court further found that consideration of the alleged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30580 - 2007-10-15
for protection in the community from Mr. Phoudavong.” The court further found that consideration of the alleged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30580 - 2007-10-15
[PDF]
State v. John A. Mosley, Sr.
, the officer “patted” the defendant down “to guarantee that Mr. Mosley did not possess the weapon or any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12089 - 2017-09-21
, the officer “patted” the defendant down “to guarantee that Mr. Mosley did not possess the weapon or any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12089 - 2017-09-21