Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6251 - 6260 of 58595 for speedy trial.

[PDF] Steven Derkson v. Troy Haarstick
awarding him $343,850 in damages and costs following a jury trial. Judgment was entered against
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2807 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 20, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
of a child and from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He argues that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27440 - 2006-12-19

COURT OF APPEALS
trial counsel was ineffective. The trial court concluded that Blank’s motion was barred by State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84444 - 2012-07-10

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
should have instead raised claims of ineffective assistance of Johnson’s trial counsel regarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256704 - 2020-05-27

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
intentional homicide and appeals from an order denying his second motion for a new trial. As with his first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206032 - 2017-12-21

[PDF] Ronald J. v. Lisa R.
that there was insufficient evidence to terminate Sandra’s guardianship, that the trial court erred in transferring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3271 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Duke M. Jawara
the trial proceedings in this action and pronounced sentence. Judge Patrick J. Taggart conducted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5724 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Mary Jane Lenhardt v. Paul W. Lenhardt
and awarded attorneys’ fees to Paul. We uphold the trial court’s determination that Mary Jane failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15820 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
of trial counsel, that the circuit court erred when it denied his motion for a new trial based on newly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56873 - 2010-11-17

State v. Barry M. Jenkins
for postconviction relief. Jenkins argues that: (1) the trial court erroneously denied his motion for plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21578 - 2006-02-23