Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6261 - 6270 of 29995 for consulta de causas.

[PDF] State v. Robert P. Eggimann
a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Pittman, 174 Wis. 2d 255, 276, 496 N.W.2d 74, 83
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5059 - 2017-09-19

Phillip Kmiec v. Byron C. Vielehr
of the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo, and we use the same methodology as the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4242 - 2005-03-31

Andy Saltarikos v. Hart Donley
of Saltarikos and Olkowski. Donley then sought and obtained a trial de novo. See Wis. Stat. § 799.207 (3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5164 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Kathleen Barry-Chamberlain v. Department of Industry
or decide the issue de novo, our conclusion is the same. See id. at 895, 498 N.W.2d at 832. We agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7974 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Cory D. Klicko
is ultimately a legal determination, which this court decides de novo. See id. at 634. ANALYSIS ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16112 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
reviews summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same methodology and legal standard employed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143207 - 2017-09-21

City of Sturgeon Bay v. Gregory M. Ebel
a question of law to be reviewed de novo. State v. Zimmerman, 185 Wis.2d 549, 554, 518 N.W.2d 303, 304 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9501 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
considers de novo. Id., ¶33. In his motion, Doyle cites his postsentencing accomplishments as factors
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=938157 - 2025-04-08

[PDF] CA Blank Order
285, 647 N.W.2d 405. We decide de novo whether a sentence violates a defendant’s constitutional
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186967 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
of whether these words constituted a “true threat” is a question of law that this court should review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33623 - 2014-09-15