Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6261 - 6270 of 83837 for simple case search/1000.

COURT OF APPEALS
impermissibly created the exigency used to justify the warrantless search in this case by knocking on his door
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26635 - 2006-10-02

[PDF] NOTICE
search in this case by knocking on his door. The trial court held the exigency did not exist until
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26635 - 2014-09-15

State v. Alexander E. Grossmann
is inapplicable to this case because, unlike the defendants in Bryant, he was not given any additional information
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11064 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Alexander E. Grossmann
that the supreme court’s ruling in Bryant is inapplicable to this case because, unlike the defendants in Bryant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11064 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
. The cases were consolidated for trial. The jury convicted Guthman of all three counts. He moved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58854 - 2011-01-18

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
3 had made a prima facie case that his plea was not knowing, voluntary and intelligent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82459 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] NOTICE
, repeated sexual assault of the same child and incest. The cases were consolidated for trial. The jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58854 - 2014-09-15

State v. Katherine E. Hepler
. § 343.305, coerces consent to search and violates the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5277 - 2005-03-31

Orville Oney v. Wolfgang Schrauth
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8386 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Orville Oney v. Wolfgang Schrauth
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8386 - 2017-09-19