Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6261 - 6270 of 58592 for speedy trial.
Search results 6261 - 6270 of 58592 for speedy trial.
Brown County Human Services Department v. Connie D.
that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion. She argues that the trial court erred by (1) denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2355 - 2005-03-31
that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion. She argues that the trial court erred by (1) denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2355 - 2005-03-31
Brown County Human Services Department v. Connie D.
that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion. She argues that the trial court erred by (1) denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2356 - 2005-03-31
that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion. She argues that the trial court erred by (1) denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2356 - 2005-03-31
Brown County Human Services Department v. Connie D.
that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion. She argues that the trial court erred by (1) denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2357 - 2005-03-31
that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion. She argues that the trial court erred by (1) denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2357 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
is whether the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion because it failed to consider the sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51218 - 2010-06-21
is whether the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion because it failed to consider the sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51218 - 2010-06-21
John Jelks v. Philip Arreola
of the Jelks's son on July 7, 1991. Arreola claims the trial court erred in granting the writ because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8434 - 2005-03-31
of the Jelks's son on July 7, 1991. Arreola claims the trial court erred in granting the writ because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8434 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Frontsheet
that there was insufficient evidence to support a conviction. Additionally, she argued that defense counsel at trial had
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204514 - 2018-02-06
that there was insufficient evidence to support a conviction. Additionally, she argued that defense counsel at trial had
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204514 - 2018-02-06
[PDF]
State v. Rodell Thompson
relief. The issues are whether Thompson received effective assistance from trial counsel, whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15076 - 2017-09-21
relief. The issues are whether Thompson received effective assistance from trial counsel, whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15076 - 2017-09-21
State v. Michael Hill
in a severe beating which left the victim permanently brain damaged and totally disabled. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10821 - 2005-03-31
in a severe beating which left the victim permanently brain damaged and totally disabled. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10821 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Michael Hill
which left the victim permanently brain damaged and totally disabled. The trial court imposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10821 - 2017-09-20
which left the victim permanently brain damaged and totally disabled. The trial court imposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10821 - 2017-09-20
State v. Keyonta T. Williams
motion alleging that trial counsel was ineffective. He argues that trial counsel was ineffective because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4735 - 2005-03-31
motion alleging that trial counsel was ineffective. He argues that trial counsel was ineffective because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4735 - 2005-03-31