Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6261 - 6270 of 50681 for writ of certiorari forms.
Search results 6261 - 6270 of 50681 for writ of certiorari forms.
Brown County v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Commission
seeking certiorari review of the commission’s decision. The circuit court affirmed the commission’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5938 - 2005-03-31
seeking certiorari review of the commission’s decision. The circuit court affirmed the commission’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5938 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the assessor’s valuation of the properties. The property owners filed for certiorari review in the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=65485 - 2014-09-15
the assessor’s valuation of the properties. The property owners filed for certiorari review in the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=65485 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2017AP1051-CRNM 3 revocation is by petition for certiorari in circuit court). The only potential
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=220362 - 2018-10-01
. No. 2017AP1051-CRNM 3 revocation is by petition for certiorari in circuit court). The only potential
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=220362 - 2018-10-01
[PDF]
Tony G. Merriweather v. Gerald Berge
2001 decision to continue his administrative confinement. ¶5 On certiorari review, we determine de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5830 - 2017-09-19
2001 decision to continue his administrative confinement. ¶5 On certiorari review, we determine de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5830 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Jayson D. Edwards v. Gary R. McCaughtry
by twenty days. The warden and the circuit court affirmed. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶6 On certiorari, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3797 - 2017-09-20
by twenty days. The warden and the circuit court affirmed. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶6 On certiorari, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3797 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Oneida County v. Robert M. Pace
in the enforcement action is the same as would have been presented in a certiorari action; (2) what issues remain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9004 - 2017-09-19
in the enforcement action is the same as would have been presented in a certiorari action; (2) what issues remain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9004 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Ira Lee Anderson-El II v. Ave M. Bie
, however, is by filing for certiorari review of the administrative action denying his ICRS complaint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15183 - 2017-09-21
, however, is by filing for certiorari review of the administrative action denying his ICRS complaint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15183 - 2017-09-21
William Gill v. City and Common Council of Oconomowoc
of the board of appeals” to commence a certiorari action. They argue that the City violated its own zoning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18858 - 2005-07-05
of the board of appeals” to commence a certiorari action. They argue that the City violated its own zoning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18858 - 2005-07-05
[PDF]
State v. Jarrell E. Hurley
in January 2003 and the three consecutive two-year terms of the stayed sentence began. On certiorari
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18691 - 2017-09-21
in January 2003 and the three consecutive two-year terms of the stayed sentence began. On certiorari
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18691 - 2017-09-21
Oneida County v. Robert M. Pace
in the enforcement action is the same as would have been presented in a certiorari action; (2) what issues remain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9004 - 2005-03-31
in the enforcement action is the same as would have been presented in a certiorari action; (2) what issues remain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9004 - 2005-03-31