Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6271 - 6280 of 50107 for our.
Search results 6271 - 6280 of 50107 for our.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
be allowed to withdraw his plea because it was not knowing, intelligent, and voluntary. Our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195592 - 2017-09-21
be allowed to withdraw his plea because it was not knowing, intelligent, and voluntary. Our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195592 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
elected not to exercise his right to file a response. Upon consideration of the no-merit report and our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=146175 - 2017-09-21
elected not to exercise his right to file a response. Upon consideration of the no-merit report and our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=146175 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Karla R. Merkes
, whether because of intoxication or the accident, we do not consider this as a factor in our probable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4030 - 2017-09-20
, whether because of intoxication or the accident, we do not consider this as a factor in our probable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4030 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 30, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court...
and perform work, but for no other purpose. I impose those sentences on the assumption that our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27935 - 2007-01-29
and perform work, but for no other purpose. I impose those sentences on the assumption that our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27935 - 2007-01-29
State v. Brian J. Lewandoske
knocking and announcing their identity and purpose. Our supreme court held in Stevens that "a no-knock
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8291 - 2005-03-31
knocking and announcing their identity and purpose. Our supreme court held in Stevens that "a no-knock
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8291 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and Debauche’s response and following our independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=535273 - 2022-06-22
and Debauche’s response and following our independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=535273 - 2022-06-22
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
but did not exercise his right to file a response. Upon consideration of the no-merit report and our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97439 - 2014-09-15
but did not exercise his right to file a response. Upon consideration of the no-merit report and our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97439 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
arbitrarily and was not neutral and detached. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192179 - 2017-09-21
arbitrarily and was not neutral and detached. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192179 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the report and advised of her right to file a response. She has not filed a response. Based on our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=318796 - 2020-12-29
of the report and advised of her right to file a response. She has not filed a response. Based on our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=318796 - 2020-12-29
State v. Karla R. Merkes
not consider this as a factor in our probable cause analysis. [3] Officer Klaas also testified that he told
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4030 - 2005-03-31
not consider this as a factor in our probable cause analysis. [3] Officer Klaas also testified that he told
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4030 - 2005-03-31