Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6271 - 6280 of 12912 for prosecuting.
Search results 6271 - 6280 of 12912 for prosecuting.
COURT OF APPEALS
a person into custody for the purpose of prosecuting him for a crime.”). When Johnson pulled his hands out
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71744 - 2011-10-03
a person into custody for the purpose of prosecuting him for a crime.”). When Johnson pulled his hands out
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71744 - 2011-10-03
State v. Avery T., Jr.
the prosecution or defense materially violated the spirit of the plea agreement is reviewed under a de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8594 - 2005-03-31
the prosecution or defense materially violated the spirit of the plea agreement is reviewed under a de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8594 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
because it couldn’t be prosecuted any further. MR. BUCHER: Right. The circuit court opined that had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97994 - 2013-06-10
because it couldn’t be prosecuted any further. MR. BUCHER: Right. The circuit court opined that had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97994 - 2013-06-10
State v. Avery T., Jr.
the prosecution or defense materially violated the spirit of the plea agreement is reviewed under a de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8593 - 2005-03-31
the prosecution or defense materially violated the spirit of the plea agreement is reviewed under a de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8593 - 2005-03-31
State v. Avery T., Jr.
the prosecution or defense materially violated the spirit of the plea agreement is reviewed under a de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8592 - 2005-03-31
the prosecution or defense materially violated the spirit of the plea agreement is reviewed under a de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8592 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Michael A. Sveum
to surprise evidence; (7) failed to adequately cross-examine prosecution witnesses; (8) failed to present
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15993 - 2017-09-21
to surprise evidence; (7) failed to adequately cross-examine prosecution witnesses; (8) failed to present
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15993 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Michael W. Jones
for stipulating with the prosecution that the crime took place within 1000 feet of a school. Jones, however
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10603 - 2017-09-20
for stipulating with the prosecution that the crime took place within 1000 feet of a school. Jones, however
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10603 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 05, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
inculpatory or exculpatory, and is measured by whether the prosecution seeks to introduce the statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27317 - 2006-12-04
inculpatory or exculpatory, and is measured by whether the prosecution seeks to introduce the statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27317 - 2006-12-04
[PDF]
State v. John R. Martin
the prosecution charged Martin with six misdemeanor counts of issuing worthless checks and six counts of bail
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11310 - 2017-09-19
the prosecution charged Martin with six misdemeanor counts of issuing worthless checks and six counts of bail
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11310 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to compromise or obstruct a criminal investigation or prosecution. All references to the Wisconsin Statutes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138330 - 2017-09-21
to compromise or obstruct a criminal investigation or prosecution. All references to the Wisconsin Statutes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138330 - 2017-09-21