Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6271 - 6280 of 60169 for quit claim deed/1000.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
a proposed land exchange in which Kohler would deed to the Department title to 9.5 acres of land located
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=286762 - 2020-09-15

State v. Robert F. Hart
intent not to arrest as he communicated it by words and deeds removed the Cupp concerns which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2642 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Robert F. Hart
is irrelevant. His intent not to arrest as he communicated it by words and deeds removed the Cupp concerns
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2642 - 2017-09-19

State v. Jason R. Dixon
and burglary with battery. We reject Dixon’s claims that the trial court violated his rights to due process
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5327 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI APP 78
that the defense is obviously wounded by this because it’s pretty sophisticated and quite convincing…. Obviously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36509 - 2014-09-15

State v. Jason R. Dixon
and burglary with battery. We reject Dixon’s claims that the trial court violated his rights to due process
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5328 - 2005-03-31

Ki Yong Park v. Boulder Venture 9, L.L.C.
leases at the Capitol Court Shopping Center. Lee and Park claim that the trial court erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6064 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Ki Yong Park v. Boulder Venture 9, L.L.C.
Shopping Center. Lee and Park claim that the trial court erred when it granted summary judgment because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6064 - 2017-09-19

State v. Shomari L. Robinson
postconviction relief. He claims that his plea agreement with the State was breached when he was prevented from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2552 - 2005-03-31

Steven Woerpel v. Reg Gill
of North America (INA), appeal, claiming that: (1) the trial court erred in ruling that INA’s policy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11298 - 2005-03-31