Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6271 - 6280 of 12879 for se.
Search results 6271 - 6280 of 12879 for se.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
A. Szemborski, pro se, appeals from an order denying his petition for a writ of certiorari from a November 16
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106123 - 2017-09-21
A. Szemborski, pro se, appeals from an order denying his petition for a writ of certiorari from a November 16
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106123 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Mary C. Behrndt v. Patrick Behrndt
of the stipulation. ¶5 Trial was scheduled for April 5, 2000. Patrick appeared at the proceedings pro se. All
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2772 - 2017-09-19
of the stipulation. ¶5 Trial was scheduled for April 5, 2000. Patrick appeared at the proceedings pro se. All
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2772 - 2017-09-19
State v. Eugene Nichols
, Anderson and Snyder, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Eugene Nichols appeals pro se from a judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14094 - 2005-03-31
, Anderson and Snyder, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Eugene Nichols appeals pro se from a judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14094 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Cane, Reserve Judge. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Shane Gressel, pro se, appeals an order denying his WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93884 - 2014-09-15
Cane, Reserve Judge. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Shane Gressel, pro se, appeals an order denying his WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93884 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Eugene Nichols
. Before Nettesheim, Anderson and Snyder, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Eugene Nichols appeals pro se from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14094 - 2014-09-15
. Before Nettesheim, Anderson and Snyder, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Eugene Nichols appeals pro se from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14094 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed. No. 2018AP337 2 ¶1 SEIDL, J.1 James Gauthier, pro se
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237937 - 2019-03-26
A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed. No. 2018AP337 2 ¶1 SEIDL, J.1 James Gauthier, pro se
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237937 - 2019-03-26
CA Blank Order
the “countersuit” in Dean’s pro se answer requested “[t]hat Jane Doe be recognized as Spouse,” the affidavit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147270 - 2015-09-01
the “countersuit” in Dean’s pro se answer requested “[t]hat Jane Doe be recognized as Spouse,” the affidavit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147270 - 2015-09-01
CA Blank Order
(L.C. # 2013CV1962) Before Lundsten, Sherman and Kloppenburg, JJ. Michael Reveles, pro se
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142575 - 2015-05-26
(L.C. # 2013CV1962) Before Lundsten, Sherman and Kloppenburg, JJ. Michael Reveles, pro se
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142575 - 2015-05-26
Victor M. Kennedy v. Adobe Center Administration
, pro se, appeals from an order of the circuit court dismissing his cause of action against
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8392 - 2005-03-31
, pro se, appeals from an order of the circuit court dismissing his cause of action against
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8392 - 2005-03-31
State v. Brian J. Maas
, § 11. Warrantless searches “are per se unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment, subject to a few
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6249 - 2005-03-31
, § 11. Warrantless searches “are per se unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment, subject to a few
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6249 - 2005-03-31