Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 62701 - 62710 of 84057 for simple case search.
Search results 62701 - 62710 of 84057 for simple case search.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
claim of self- defense “[did] not fully capture all of the facts of this case.” This appeal follows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=985859 - 2025-07-22
claim of self- defense “[did] not fully capture all of the facts of this case.” This appeal follows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=985859 - 2025-07-22
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition, and affirm. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92708 - 2013-02-12
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition, and affirm. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92708 - 2013-02-12
_WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS
, except to support a claim of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, or law of the case. Per curiam opinions
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83702 - 2012-06-12
, except to support a claim of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, or law of the case. Per curiam opinions
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83702 - 2012-06-12
State v. Robert Fritsch
was entered, which in this case was the sentencing date. This court agrees and affirms the judgment. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2688 - 2005-03-31
was entered, which in this case was the sentencing date. This court agrees and affirms the judgment. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2688 - 2005-03-31
Reginald Terry v. Gary McCaughtry
open.[3] We affirm. Summary judgment is appropriate in cases in which there is no genuine issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10369 - 2005-03-31
open.[3] We affirm. Summary judgment is appropriate in cases in which there is no genuine issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10369 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of the County’s case, Carlson moved to dismiss the case, arguing the County failed to meet its burden of showing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32625 - 2008-05-05
of the County’s case, Carlson moved to dismiss the case, arguing the County failed to meet its burden of showing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32625 - 2008-05-05
COURT OF APPEALS
in the hotel room. ¶4 The case was heard and subsequently dismissed by a court commissioner, and Lee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44481 - 2009-12-09
in the hotel room. ¶4 The case was heard and subsequently dismissed by a court commissioner, and Lee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44481 - 2009-12-09
CA Blank Order
the case and discussing the case with Ford, there is no basis for a plea withdrawal motion. Ford filed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91053 - 2013-01-02
the case and discussing the case with Ford, there is no basis for a plea withdrawal motion. Ford filed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91053 - 2013-01-02
[PDF]
NOTICE
, a proper sentencing factor. See id., ¶23. ¶7 The sentence in this case is a textbook example
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33222 - 2014-09-15
, a proper sentencing factor. See id., ¶23. ¶7 The sentence in this case is a textbook example
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33222 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
for a certain period of time—in this case, twelve months—employment “contracts” that “specify no term
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105619 - 2013-12-16
for a certain period of time—in this case, twelve months—employment “contracts” that “specify no term
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105619 - 2013-12-16