Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 62761 - 62770 of 64668 for b's.
Search results 62761 - 62770 of 64668 for b's.
COURT OF APPEALS
will not be published. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)4. [1] This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118622 - 2014-07-30
will not be published. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)4. [1] This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118622 - 2014-07-30
John A. Balcerzak v. Board of Fire and Police Commissioners for the City of Milwaukee
either interpretation of the statute is reasonable, we conclude that the phrase is ambiguous. B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14599 - 2005-03-31
either interpretation of the statute is reasonable, we conclude that the phrase is ambiguous. B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14599 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
This opinion will not be published. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(1)(b)5.
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=932542 - 2025-03-26
This opinion will not be published. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(1)(b)5.
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=932542 - 2025-03-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
as a result of defense counsel’s proffer of evidence. See Strickland, 466 U.S. at 694. B. Testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83737 - 2014-09-15
as a result of defense counsel’s proffer of evidence. See Strickland, 466 U.S. at 694. B. Testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83737 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. By the Court.—Order affirmed. This opinion will not be published. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(1)(b)5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156190 - 2017-09-21
. By the Court.—Order affirmed. This opinion will not be published. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(1)(b)5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156190 - 2017-09-21
2008 WI APP 95
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Dane County: sarah b. o’brien, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32574 - 2011-06-14
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Dane County: sarah b. o’brien, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32574 - 2011-06-14
[PDF]
Village of Hobart v. Brown County
STAT. § 13.48(13)(a) states: Except as provided in par. (b) or (c), every building, structure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6685 - 2017-09-20
STAT. § 13.48(13)(a) states: Except as provided in par. (b) or (c), every building, structure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6685 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
well. Counsel was not ineffective for failing to continuously object to the State’s questions. B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208612 - 2018-02-20
well. Counsel was not ineffective for failing to continuously object to the State’s questions. B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208612 - 2018-02-20
State v. Thermond Larry III
intentionally or recklessly omit facts of which he or she is not aware. B. Other Acts Evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12992 - 2005-03-31
intentionally or recklessly omit facts of which he or she is not aware. B. Other Acts Evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12992 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Erika Eneman v. Pat Richter
of the chosen plan, were discretionary, not ministerial, acts. b. Non-governmental acts. Appellants also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11536 - 2017-09-19
of the chosen plan, were discretionary, not ministerial, acts. b. Non-governmental acts. Appellants also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11536 - 2017-09-19