Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 62761 - 62770 of 83351 for simple case search/1000.
Search results 62761 - 62770 of 83351 for simple case search/1000.
[PDF]
NOTICE
2 This case is distinguishable from our recent decision in State v. Fortier, 2006 WI App 11, 289
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27034 - 2014-09-15
2 This case is distinguishable from our recent decision in State v. Fortier, 2006 WI App 11, 289
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27034 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2015-16). 1 We summarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=198100 - 2017-10-25
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2015-16). 1 We summarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=198100 - 2017-10-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=259522 - 2020-05-06
upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=259522 - 2020-05-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
conclude that this case is appropriate for summary 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1026741 - 2025-10-23
conclude that this case is appropriate for summary 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1026741 - 2025-10-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1040816 - 2025-11-25
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1040816 - 2025-11-25
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED April 23, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of Appe...
testimony when determining whether this was a close case, and we do not consider that testimony in our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95673 - 2013-04-22
testimony when determining whether this was a close case, and we do not consider that testimony in our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95673 - 2013-04-22
State v. Esther M. Phillips-Crouch
that “this was a borderline case,” but concluded that Osborne’s “credible testimony provides the basis for a legal stop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19195 - 2005-08-01
that “this was a borderline case,” but concluded that Osborne’s “credible testimony provides the basis for a legal stop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19195 - 2005-08-01
Harold Carlson Trust v. St. Croix County
Having resolved the case on the question of governmental immunity, we need not discuss the remaining
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2539 - 2005-03-31
Having resolved the case on the question of governmental immunity, we need not discuss the remaining
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2539 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
this as a “stop” case. But there was no stop until the deputy decided to have field sobriety tests. Up until
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46226 - 2010-01-26
this as a “stop” case. But there was no stop until the deputy decided to have field sobriety tests. Up until
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46226 - 2010-01-26
[PDF]
Bluebird Ridge, L.L.C. v. Town of Shelby
the judgment in part and remand for further proceedings. ¶2 This case arises out of the development
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5629 - 2017-09-19
the judgment in part and remand for further proceedings. ¶2 This case arises out of the development
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5629 - 2017-09-19