Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6281 - 6290 of 50108 for our.
Search results 6281 - 6290 of 50108 for our.
State v. Brian J. Lewandoske
knocking and announcing their identity and purpose. Our supreme court held in Stevens that "a no-knock
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8291 - 2005-03-31
knocking and announcing their identity and purpose. Our supreme court held in Stevens that "a no-knock
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8291 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
traffic stop was impermissibly based on a mistake of law. Based upon our review of the briefs and record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145079 - 2015-07-28
traffic stop was impermissibly based on a mistake of law. Based upon our review of the briefs and record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145079 - 2015-07-28
[PDF]
County of Manitowoc v. Jean R. Klug
be crossed without a warrant.” Id. at 590. ¶9 Klug directs us to our decision in Larson, where we held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7550 - 2017-09-19
be crossed without a warrant.” Id. at 590. ¶9 Klug directs us to our decision in Larson, where we held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7550 - 2017-09-19
CA Blank Order
not filed a response. Based on our independent review of the no-merit report and the record, this court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103550 - 2013-10-23
not filed a response. Based on our independent review of the no-merit report and the record, this court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103550 - 2013-10-23
COURT OF APPEALS
. See Hartung v. Hartung, 102 Wis. 2d 58, 66, 306 N.W.2d 16 (1981) (our inquiry is whether discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52522 - 2010-07-26
. See Hartung v. Hartung, 102 Wis. 2d 58, 66, 306 N.W.2d 16 (1981) (our inquiry is whether discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52522 - 2010-07-26
State v. Deshawn M.D.
, 219, 550 N.W.2d 96, 98 (1996). Our first inquiry is always to the language of the statute. Cary v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14316 - 2005-03-31
, 219, 550 N.W.2d 96, 98 (1996). Our first inquiry is always to the language of the statute. Cary v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14316 - 2005-03-31
State v. Karla R. Merkes
not consider this as a factor in our probable cause analysis. [3] Officer Klaas also testified that he told
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4030 - 2005-03-31
not consider this as a factor in our probable cause analysis. [3] Officer Klaas also testified that he told
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4030 - 2005-03-31
2007 WI APP 228
protected Williams against liability for Clayton’s injuries. II. ¶5 Our review of a circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30333 - 2007-10-30
protected Williams against liability for Clayton’s injuries. II. ¶5 Our review of a circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30333 - 2007-10-30
State v. Charles B. Dietzen
our discretionary right to reverse under § 752.35, Stats. We reject Dietzen's claims and, therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8932 - 2005-03-31
our discretionary right to reverse under § 752.35, Stats. We reject Dietzen's claims and, therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8932 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Amy Willoughby
and unambiguous on its face, our inquiry ends, and we must simply apply the statute to the facts of the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12407 - 2017-09-21
and unambiguous on its face, our inquiry ends, and we must simply apply the statute to the facts of the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12407 - 2017-09-21