Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6281 - 6290 of 50108 for our.
Search results 6281 - 6290 of 50108 for our.
State v. Bryant E. Carter
the admissibility of evidence. State v. Oberlander, 149 Wis. 2d 132, 140, 438 N.W.2d 580 (1989). Our review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4960 - 2005-03-31
the admissibility of evidence. State v. Oberlander, 149 Wis. 2d 132, 140, 438 N.W.2d 580 (1989). Our review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4960 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
whether Murn’s pleas were entered knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently. Our review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=669440 - 2023-06-21
whether Murn’s pleas were entered knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently. Our review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=669440 - 2023-06-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (2013-14). 1 Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181209 - 2017-09-21
to WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (2013-14). 1 Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181209 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Wis. 2d 844, ¶8. Our review of the record confirms that the circuit court appropriately considered
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=751664 - 2024-01-17
Wis. 2d 844, ¶8. Our review of the record confirms that the circuit court appropriately considered
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=751664 - 2024-01-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
consideration of the no-merit report and response and our independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174917 - 2017-09-21
consideration of the no-merit report and response and our independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174917 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Timothy S. Moen
discretion, and our review is limited to whether the trial court erred in the exercise of that discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13038 - 2017-09-21
discretion, and our review is limited to whether the trial court erred in the exercise of that discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13038 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
granted summary judgment in favor of the City. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=147446 - 2017-09-21
granted summary judgment in favor of the City. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=147446 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
denying reconsideration. Our jurisdiction is limited to review of any new issues presented
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165810 - 2017-09-21
denying reconsideration. Our jurisdiction is limited to review of any new issues presented
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165810 - 2017-09-21
State v. Brian J. Lewandoske
knocking and announcing their identity and purpose. Our supreme court held in Stevens that "a no-knock
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8291 - 2005-03-31
knocking and announcing their identity and purpose. Our supreme court held in Stevens that "a no-knock
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8291 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
traffic stop was impermissibly based on a mistake of law. Based upon our review of the briefs and record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145079 - 2015-07-28
traffic stop was impermissibly based on a mistake of law. Based upon our review of the briefs and record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145079 - 2015-07-28