Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6281 - 6290 of 18724 for quote.
Search results 6281 - 6290 of 18724 for quote.
State v. Maxie W. Harvey, Jr.
) (quoting State v. Johnson, 133 Wis.2d 207, 217, 395 N.W.2d 176, 181 (1986)). We thus assess whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14462 - 2005-03-31
) (quoting State v. Johnson, 133 Wis.2d 207, 217, 395 N.W.2d 176, 181 (1986)). We thus assess whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14462 - 2005-03-31
State v. Brian R. Huisman
, 363, 588 N.W.2d 606 (1999) (quoting Oregon v. Elstad, 470 U.S. 298, 314 (1985)). Because none
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14516 - 2005-03-31
, 363, 588 N.W.2d 606 (1999) (quoting Oregon v. Elstad, 470 U.S. 298, 314 (1985)). Because none
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14516 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
’ or ‘hypothetical.’” Fox v. DHSS, 112 Wis. 2d 514, 525, 334 N.W.2d 532 (1983) (quoting Los Angeles v. Lyons, 461
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31966 - 2008-02-27
’ or ‘hypothetical.’” Fox v. DHSS, 112 Wis. 2d 514, 525, 334 N.W.2d 532 (1983) (quoting Los Angeles v. Lyons, 461
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31966 - 2008-02-27
State v. Maxie W. Harvey, Jr.
) (quoting State v. Johnson, 133 Wis.2d 207, 217, 395 N.W.2d 176, 181 (1986)). We thus assess whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14461 - 2005-03-31
) (quoting State v. Johnson, 133 Wis.2d 207, 217, 395 N.W.2d 176, 181 (1986)). We thus assess whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14461 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, reached a conclusion that a reasonable judge could reach.’”) (quoted source omitted). Shymika S. W. has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107709 - 2014-02-03
, reached a conclusion that a reasonable judge could reach.’”) (quoted source omitted). Shymika S. W. has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107709 - 2014-02-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the parties.” Id., ¶40 (quoting Rosado v. State, 70 Wis. 2d 280, 288, 234 N.W.2d 69 (1975)). Whether
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=713494 - 2023-10-11
of the parties.” Id., ¶40 (quoting Rosado v. State, 70 Wis. 2d 280, 288, 234 N.W.2d 69 (1975)). Whether
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=713494 - 2023-10-11
[PDF]
NOTICE
of the parties.” State v. Franklin, 148 Wis. 2d 1, 8, 434 N.W.2d 609 (1989) (quoting Rosado v. State, 70 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51218 - 2014-09-15
of the parties.” State v. Franklin, 148 Wis. 2d 1, 8, 434 N.W.2d 609 (1989) (quoting Rosado v. State, 70 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51218 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to the trial court’s decision, although the trial court’s decision is not controlling.’” Id. (quoting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=484766 - 2022-02-17
to the trial court’s decision, although the trial court’s decision is not controlling.’” Id. (quoting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=484766 - 2022-02-17
Noffke Lumber, Inc. v. James P. Siepmann
v. Kuhnly, 26 Wis.2d 193, 197, 131 N.W.2d 840, 842 (1965) (quoted source omitted). By the Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13381 - 2005-03-31
v. Kuhnly, 26 Wis.2d 193, 197, 131 N.W.2d 840, 842 (1965) (quoted source omitted). By the Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13381 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
to undermine confidence in the outcome.” Id. (quoting Strickland, 466 U.S. at 694). ¶12 Sonnenberg
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28317 - 2014-09-15
to undermine confidence in the outcome.” Id. (quoting Strickland, 466 U.S. at 694). ¶12 Sonnenberg
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28317 - 2014-09-15