Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 62871 - 62880 of 82591 for simple case.
Search results 62871 - 62880 of 82591 for simple case.
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
that this case is appropriate for summary No. 2025AP1369-FT 2 disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1109888 - 2026-04-29
that this case is appropriate for summary No. 2025AP1369-FT 2 disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1109888 - 2026-04-29
State v. Michael Ray Juber
comment at sentencing that this case has “been a prison case since day one” shows the court had decided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5032 - 2005-03-31
comment at sentencing that this case has “been a prison case since day one” shows the court had decided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5032 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22).1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=741921 - 2023-12-19
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22).1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=741921 - 2023-12-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22).1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=741921 - 2023-12-19
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22).1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=741921 - 2023-12-19
CA Blank Order
otherwise noted. [2] Cases appealed under Wis. Stat. Rule 809.107 “shall be given preference and shall
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142568 - 2015-05-27
otherwise noted. [2] Cases appealed under Wis. Stat. Rule 809.107 “shall be given preference and shall
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142568 - 2015-05-27
COURT OF APPEALS
, Door County was prepared to try the case and its subpoenaed witnesses were present. The County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107948 - 2014-02-10
, Door County was prepared to try the case and its subpoenaed witnesses were present. The County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107948 - 2014-02-10
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and explained their application to this case. See generally State v. Gallion, 2004 WI 42, ¶¶39- 46, 270 Wis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=147358 - 2017-09-21
and explained their application to this case. See generally State v. Gallion, 2004 WI 42, ¶¶39- 46, 270 Wis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=147358 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
of reasonable suspicion de novo. See id. ¶8 In O’Connor’s case, the suspicion that prompted the deputy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91896 - 2013-01-22
of reasonable suspicion de novo. See id. ¶8 In O’Connor’s case, the suspicion that prompted the deputy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91896 - 2013-01-22
CA Blank Order
. § 943.201(2)(b) (2011-12).[1] The trial court dismissed and read in two crimes charged in case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122903 - 2014-09-28
. § 943.201(2)(b) (2011-12).[1] The trial court dismissed and read in two crimes charged in case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122903 - 2014-09-28
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
-NM 4 At the dispositional hearing, Jasmine Ragland, A.G.’s case manager, testified
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=318796 - 2020-12-29
-NM 4 At the dispositional hearing, Jasmine Ragland, A.G.’s case manager, testified
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=318796 - 2020-12-29