Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 62871 - 62880 of 83386 for simple case search/1000.
Search results 62871 - 62880 of 83386 for simple case search/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS
. Citing cases that involved illegal detention or subterfuge, Reeverts argues he was incapable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88805 - 2012-10-29
. Citing cases that involved illegal detention or subterfuge, Reeverts argues he was incapable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88805 - 2012-10-29
COURT OF APPEALS
or mandatory parole, for the purpose of calculating the maximum reincarceration term. In both cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35863 - 2009-03-11
or mandatory parole, for the purpose of calculating the maximum reincarceration term. In both cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35863 - 2009-03-11
COURT OF APPEALS
sentencing factor. See id., ¶23. ¶7 The sentence in this case is a textbook example
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33222 - 2008-07-01
sentencing factor. See id., ¶23. ¶7 The sentence in this case is a textbook example
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33222 - 2008-07-01
State v. Kyle J. Gierach
if “in the circumstances of a particular case evidence of a complainant’s prior sexual conduct may be so relevant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14838 - 2005-03-31
if “in the circumstances of a particular case evidence of a complainant’s prior sexual conduct may be so relevant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14838 - 2005-03-31
State v. Kathleen Wagner
of the sentence.” Id. The seminal case defining a new factor is Rosado v. State, 70 Wis.2d 280, 288, 234 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14868 - 2005-03-31
of the sentence.” Id. The seminal case defining a new factor is Rosado v. State, 70 Wis.2d 280, 288, 234 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14868 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
conclude that this case is appropriate for summary 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1026741 - 2025-10-23
conclude that this case is appropriate for summary 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1026741 - 2025-10-23
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition, and affirm. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92708 - 2013-02-12
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition, and affirm. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92708 - 2013-02-12
Richard N. Nickl v. John Husz
short of qualifying for parole. The respondents did so in this case by informing Nickl that he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13139 - 2005-03-31
short of qualifying for parole. The respondents did so in this case by informing Nickl that he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13139 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21(1) (2011-12).[1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114318 - 2014-06-09
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21(1) (2011-12).[1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114318 - 2014-06-09
COURT OF APPEALS
entering under the circumstances of this particular case. The fact that the security board, I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31225 - 2007-12-17
entering under the circumstances of this particular case. The fact that the security board, I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31225 - 2007-12-17