Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 62911 - 62920 of 98748 for court records search online.
Search results 62911 - 62920 of 98748 for court records search online.
[PDF]
David J. Bley v. Deborah J. Bley
NOTICE COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED May 3, 2006 Cornelia G
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24964 - 2017-09-21
NOTICE COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED May 3, 2006 Cornelia G
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24964 - 2017-09-21
Certification
the deceased leaves minor children under 18 years of age shall be void unless approved by a court of record
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98914 - 2013-07-02
the deceased leaves minor children under 18 years of age shall be void unless approved by a court of record
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98914 - 2013-07-02
[PDF]
Oral Argument Synopses - April 2007
records, concluded the case was “suspicious for abuse.” After an evidentiary hearing, the trial court
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28666 - 2014-09-15
records, concluded the case was “suspicious for abuse.” After an evidentiary hearing, the trial court
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28666 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. David Haecker
, lack of a prior record, and his remorse, repentance, and cooperativeness.” This court does not agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13375 - 2017-09-21
, lack of a prior record, and his remorse, repentance, and cooperativeness.” This court does not agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13375 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
not file a notice of appeal, is taken from the electronic court record for that case as maintained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34162 - 2014-09-15
not file a notice of appeal, is taken from the electronic court record for that case as maintained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34162 - 2014-09-15
State v. David Haecker
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED NOTICE April 28, 1998 This opinion is subject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13375 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED NOTICE April 28, 1998 This opinion is subject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13375 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Town of Eldorado v. Harry Schmitz, Jr.
for this 1 Schmitz argues that the court imposed a forfeiture of over $28,000. The record indicates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5105 - 2017-09-19
for this 1 Schmitz argues that the court imposed a forfeiture of over $28,000. The record indicates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5105 - 2017-09-19
Town of Eldorado v. Harry Schmitz, Jr.
a forfeiture of over $28,000. The record indicates, however, that the court imposed a forfeiture of $22,850
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5105 - 2005-03-31
a forfeiture of over $28,000. The record indicates, however, that the court imposed a forfeiture of $22,850
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5105 - 2005-03-31
Douglas Niemann v. Steve Adler
on August 26 is an issue of fact and the court had a sufficient basis in the record making the finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13281 - 2005-03-31
on August 26 is an issue of fact and the court had a sufficient basis in the record making the finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13281 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Douglas Niemann v. Steve Adler
and the court had a sufficient basis in the record making the finding that the judgment was mailed August 26
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13281 - 2017-09-21
and the court had a sufficient basis in the record making the finding that the judgment was mailed August 26
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13281 - 2017-09-21