Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 62911 - 62920 of 82591 for simple case.

State v. James Stankiewicz
). The validity of an investigatory stop is governed by the landmark case of Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10828 - 2005-03-31

State v. Steven Wroten
was not relevant to the charge in this case and not fundamental to the determination of the guilt or innocence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11690 - 2005-03-31

State v. Gabreon J. Stone
. Accordingly, the trial court's reference to the involvement of drugs in this case was not a misstatement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9570 - 2005-03-31

Kimberly K. Hotz v. Russell L. Hotz
support. Section 767.32(1)(b)2. In this case, the last child support order was the parties' March 1990
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8013 - 2005-03-31

Patricia H.S. v. Richard Lee R.
, 525 N.W.2d 384, 385 (Ct. App. 1994), clearly bars such procedure in a TPR case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11229 - 2005-03-31

Renae Sloan v. Robert Patnode, Jr.
. The court ordered Robert to show cause for his contempt. After the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13831 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 30, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court...
was charged and the case proceeded to trial. Harris did not appear on the day of trial, however, and police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27922 - 2007-01-29

County of Manitowoc v. Walter J. Kugler
a switchblade knife in a case on Kugler’s belt. Horneck issued a uniform traffic citation charging “speeding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2335 - 2005-03-31

State v. Michael A. Sveum
of the State’s case; (10) failed to adequately prepare defense witnesses; (11) failed to adequately investigate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15993 - 2005-03-31

State v. Leng Xiong
motion and, therefore, it cannot constitute a sufficient reason in this case. We decline to adopt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21749 - 2006-03-13