Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 62951 - 62960 of 83837 for simple case search/1000.
Search results 62951 - 62960 of 83837 for simple case search/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS
§ 10.05(8). ¶9 The City misunderstands the scope of this case. The question here is not whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28723 - 2007-04-16
§ 10.05(8). ¶9 The City misunderstands the scope of this case. The question here is not whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28723 - 2007-04-16
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
. Based upon our review of the briefs and Record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=990224 - 2025-07-30
. Based upon our review of the briefs and Record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=990224 - 2025-07-30
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1040816 - 2025-11-25
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1040816 - 2025-11-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the circumstances of the case, which were aggravated by Barnes’ parental-like relationship with the victim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=221849 - 2018-10-17
the circumstances of the case, which were aggravated by Barnes’ parental-like relationship with the victim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=221849 - 2018-10-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2013-14). 1 As we find
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180429 - 2017-09-21
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2013-14). 1 As we find
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180429 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
by the contempt order. ¶8 The court began its discussion by stating that “this case is not in a vacuum
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57878 - 2014-09-15
by the contempt order. ¶8 The court began its discussion by stating that “this case is not in a vacuum
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57878 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
case. However, the court need not hold an evidentiary hearing unless the motion alleges facts which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113196 - 2017-09-21
case. However, the court need not hold an evidentiary hearing unless the motion alleges facts which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113196 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Jovan T. Mull
offender. The cases were joined over Mull’s objection. ¶3 At the preliminary hearing for the victim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6794 - 2017-09-20
offender. The cases were joined over Mull’s objection. ¶3 At the preliminary hearing for the victim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6794 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. David Womble
discussed the merits of his case with him. Trial counsel testified to the contrary on both points
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11158 - 2017-09-19
discussed the merits of his case with him. Trial counsel testified to the contrary on both points
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11158 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Damon S. Clark
was just the case previous to this, um, and also indicate to the Defendant and defense counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11867 - 2017-09-21
was just the case previous to this, um, and also indicate to the Defendant and defense counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11867 - 2017-09-21