Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 62951 - 62960 of 83837 for simple case search/1000.
Search results 62951 - 62960 of 83837 for simple case search/1000.
Biersdorf & Associates v. Spire Capital Corporation
:1.5(a).[1] Rather, the court should review “all the circumstances of the case to determine whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7201 - 2005-03-31
:1.5(a).[1] Rather, the court should review “all the circumstances of the case to determine whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7201 - 2005-03-31
Reginald Terry v. Gary McCaughtry
open.[3] We affirm. Summary judgment is appropriate in cases in which there is no genuine issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10369 - 2005-03-31
open.[3] We affirm. Summary judgment is appropriate in cases in which there is no genuine issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10369 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, but has not filed a response. By prior order, we placed this case on hold to await an opinion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218626 - 2018-08-31
, but has not filed a response. By prior order, we placed this case on hold to await an opinion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218626 - 2018-08-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, because it is probable that justice has miscarried in his case. We will exercise our discretion to grant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35062 - 2008-12-29
, because it is probable that justice has miscarried in his case. We will exercise our discretion to grant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35062 - 2008-12-29
State v. Vance J. Yerke
was reasonable, given the facts of the particular case, viewed at the time of counsel’s conduct. Id. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6885 - 2005-03-31
was reasonable, given the facts of the particular case, viewed at the time of counsel’s conduct. Id. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6885 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Mark Drew
is based on older case law, and he does not explain why a disjunctive test remains good law after Wilson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10672 - 2017-09-20
is based on older case law, and he does not explain why a disjunctive test remains good law after Wilson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10672 - 2017-09-20
CA Blank Order
various testimony, including from the children’s foster parents, case manager, psychologist, and Shatasha
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103416 - 2013-10-28
various testimony, including from the children’s foster parents, case manager, psychologist, and Shatasha
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103416 - 2013-10-28
[PDF]
Edward G. Stolzman v. Mary A. Stolzman
reasoned that this is an appropriate case for an equalization of income primarily because of the 30 year
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13884 - 2014-09-15
reasoned that this is an appropriate case for an equalization of income primarily because of the 30 year
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13884 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Louis H. LaCount
of restitution and, in any case, that it should be barred from holding a hearing more than two and one-half
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11225 - 2017-09-19
of restitution and, in any case, that it should be barred from holding a hearing more than two and one-half
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11225 - 2017-09-19
CA Blank Order
the case was remanded for resentencing before a different judge. State v. Biesterveld, No. 2005AP2138-CR
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144562 - 2015-07-21
the case was remanded for resentencing before a different judge. State v. Biesterveld, No. 2005AP2138-CR
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144562 - 2015-07-21