Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 631 - 640 of 6244 for cf.
Search results 631 - 640 of 6244 for cf.
State v. Jason J. Simonis
the plea. Cf. United States v. Coffin, 76 F.3d 494, 497-98 (2d Cir. 1996). Simonis never objected
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12633 - 2005-03-31
the plea. Cf. United States v. Coffin, 76 F.3d 494, 497-98 (2d Cir. 1996). Simonis never objected
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12633 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jason J. Simonis
to object to counsel’s performance, not after the plea. Cf. United States v. Coffin, 76 F.3d 494, 497-98
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12633 - 2017-09-21
to object to counsel’s performance, not after the plea. Cf. United States v. Coffin, 76 F.3d 494, 497-98
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12633 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Jacqueline Farence
. § 808.10 and RULE 809.62. Appeal No. 02-0999-CR Cir. Ct. No. 98-CF-17 STATE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5150 - 2017-09-19
. § 808.10 and RULE 809.62. Appeal No. 02-0999-CR Cir. Ct. No. 98-CF-17 STATE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5150 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Cheryl L. Thomas
. § 808.10 and RULE 809.62. Appeal No. 02-2953-CR Cir. Ct. No. 02-CF-158 STATE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5848 - 2017-09-19
. § 808.10 and RULE 809.62. Appeal No. 02-2953-CR Cir. Ct. No. 02-CF-158 STATE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5848 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 05, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
, relevant and material as contemplated by State v. O’Brien, 223 Wis. 2d 303, 320, 588 N.W.2d 8 (1999). Cf
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27304 - 2006-12-04
, relevant and material as contemplated by State v. O’Brien, 223 Wis. 2d 303, 320, 588 N.W.2d 8 (1999). Cf
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27304 - 2006-12-04
State v. Frank J. Sackatook, Jr.
discretion on the record, we reverse that part of the judgment in 99-CF-151, and remand the cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3275 - 2005-03-31
discretion on the record, we reverse that part of the judgment in 99-CF-151, and remand the cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3275 - 2005-03-31
State v. Frank J. Sackatook, Jr.
discretion on the record, we reverse that part of the judgment in 99-CF-151, and remand the cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3274 - 2005-03-31
discretion on the record, we reverse that part of the judgment in 99-CF-151, and remand the cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3274 - 2005-03-31
State v. Michael K. Stavlo
beyond the form and label of the document to the substance and nature of the determination); cf. In re
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10660 - 2005-03-31
beyond the form and label of the document to the substance and nature of the determination); cf. In re
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10660 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Herschel Knighton
-CF-721 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT II STATE OF WISCONSIN
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4910 - 2017-09-19
-CF-721 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT II STATE OF WISCONSIN
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4910 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
not block the defendant’s vehicle); Cf. State v. Griffith, 2000 WI 72, ¶39, 236 Wis. 2d 48, 613 N.W.2d 72
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47269 - 2010-02-22
not block the defendant’s vehicle); Cf. State v. Griffith, 2000 WI 72, ¶39, 236 Wis. 2d 48, 613 N.W.2d 72
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47269 - 2010-02-22