Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 631 - 640 of 29821 for des.
Search results 631 - 640 of 29821 for des.
R.M. Iverson v. City of River Falls
erroneously denied him a de novo hearing on his action to recover excessive taxes under § 74.37(3)(d), Stats
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8997 - 2005-03-31
erroneously denied him a de novo hearing on his action to recover excessive taxes under § 74.37(3)(d), Stats
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8997 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Rebecca J. Atwood v. Robert E. Atwood
by a court commissioner who suspended his obligation to pay maintenance. Rebecca requested a de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12927 - 2017-09-21
by a court commissioner who suspended his obligation to pay maintenance. Rebecca requested a de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12927 - 2017-09-21
State v. Maurice W. Carpenter
standard of review. See State v. Bentley, 201 Wis.2d 303, 310, 548 N.W.2d 50, 53 (1996). We determine de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10727 - 2005-03-31
standard of review. See State v. Bentley, 201 Wis.2d 303, 310, 548 N.W.2d 50, 53 (1996). We determine de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10727 - 2005-03-31
River Bank of De Soto v. Raymond Fisher
RIVER BANK OF DE SOTO f/n/a DE SOTO STATE BANK
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8520 - 2005-03-31
RIVER BANK OF DE SOTO f/n/a DE SOTO STATE BANK
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8520 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
R.M. Iverson v. City of River Falls
him a de novo hearing on his action to recover excessive taxes under § 74.37(3)(d), STATS., and (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8997 - 2017-09-19
him a de novo hearing on his action to recover excessive taxes under § 74.37(3)(d), STATS., and (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8997 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
. That case was dismissed. Levin filed a timely demand in the circuit court for a trial de novo. Dane
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35997 - 2014-09-15
. That case was dismissed. Levin filed a timely demand in the circuit court for a trial de novo. Dane
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35997 - 2014-09-15
State v. Stacy Wayne Willis
step is to “review the determination of reasonable suspicion de novo.” Id. Findings of Fact ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5158 - 2005-03-31
step is to “review the determination of reasonable suspicion de novo.” Id. Findings of Fact ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5158 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Rule Order
of de minimus violations. The court discussed this petition at open rules conference on January
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165845 - 2017-09-21
of de minimus violations. The court discussed this petition at open rules conference on January
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165845 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
B&D Contractors, Inc. v. Arwin Window Systems, Inc.
review of a trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25250 - 2017-09-21
review of a trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25250 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
General Casualty Company of Wisconsin v. City of Milwaukee
to a set of undisputed facts, which also commands our de novo review. See Pattermann v. Pattermann, 173
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8663 - 2017-09-19
to a set of undisputed facts, which also commands our de novo review. See Pattermann v. Pattermann, 173
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8663 - 2017-09-19