Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 631 - 640 of 2929 for lie.
Search results 631 - 640 of 2929 for lie.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. at 76, 78. “[A]ttacking a judgment is not regarded with favor by the courts and will lie only
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=958770 - 2025-05-16
. at 76, 78. “[A]ttacking a judgment is not regarded with favor by the courts and will lie only
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=958770 - 2025-05-16
[PDF]
NOTICE
. In closing arguments, the prosecutor argued that Bolstad lied about Mitchell’s presence, and this lie
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35062 - 2014-09-15
. In closing arguments, the prosecutor argued that Bolstad lied about Mitchell’s presence, and this lie
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35062 - 2014-09-15
David J. Gehl v. Town of Perry
mandamus would lie. By the Court.—Order affirmed. This opinion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25531 - 2006-06-14
mandamus would lie. By the Court.—Order affirmed. This opinion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25531 - 2006-06-14
[PDF]
NOTICE
. A claim for malicious prosecution will lie only where there was “‘a prior institution or continuation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49311 - 2014-09-15
. A claim for malicious prosecution will lie only where there was “‘a prior institution or continuation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49311 - 2014-09-15
State v. Rodell Thompson
to investigate the possibility that Kayla’s mother induced her to lie. ¶6 To prove
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15076 - 2006-11-06
to investigate the possibility that Kayla’s mother induced her to lie. ¶6 To prove
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15076 - 2006-11-06
[PDF]
State v. Lawrence H.
be a lie. The second statement was simply an acknowledgment that parents pressure children to recant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11587 - 2017-09-19
be a lie. The second statement was simply an acknowledgment that parents pressure children to recant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11587 - 2017-09-19
State v. Lawrence H.
other than testimony that the assaults occurred would be a lie. The second statement was simply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11587 - 2005-03-31
other than testimony that the assaults occurred would be a lie. The second statement was simply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11587 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
lie to you; right?” Similarly, Yenter responded, “No. We’re -- you’re not getting arrested
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=930174 - 2025-03-20
lie to you; right?” Similarly, Yenter responded, “No. We’re -- you’re not getting arrested
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=930174 - 2025-03-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. and would lie about her whereabouts and getting high. ¶12 C.D. testified that the next day A.B. called
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=628528 - 2023-03-02
. and would lie about her whereabouts and getting high. ¶12 C.D. testified that the next day A.B. called
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=628528 - 2023-03-02
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, both Jones and Maria had bias and a potential motive to lie because Jones had “a lot at stake
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=467611 - 2021-12-28
, both Jones and Maria had bias and a potential motive to lie because Jones had “a lot at stake
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=467611 - 2021-12-28