Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 631 - 640 of 58492 for speedy trial.
Search results 631 - 640 of 58492 for speedy trial.
[MS WORD]
JD-1804: Order for Revocation of Trial Reunification
Date of Birth Order for Revocation of Trial Reunification Case No. THE COURT FINDS
/formdisplay/JD-1804.doc?formNumber=JD-1804&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=en - 2025-01-07
Date of Birth Order for Revocation of Trial Reunification Case No. THE COURT FINDS
/formdisplay/JD-1804.doc?formNumber=JD-1804&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=en - 2025-01-07
[MS WORD]
JD-1803: Order for Extension of Trial Reunification
Date of Birth Order for Extension of Trial Reunification Case No. THE COURT FINDS
/formdisplay/JD-1803.doc?formNumber=JD-1803&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=en - 2025-01-07
Date of Birth Order for Extension of Trial Reunification Case No. THE COURT FINDS
/formdisplay/JD-1803.doc?formNumber=JD-1803&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=en - 2025-01-07
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
several pro se motions while represented, including a speedy trial demand; ultimately, the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=606370 - 2023-01-04
several pro se motions while represented, including a speedy trial demand; ultimately, the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=606370 - 2023-01-04
[PDF]
State v. Larry G. Edwards
) for trial within the statutory time limit. The State then filed a motion for reconsideration
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16577 - 2017-09-21
) for trial within the statutory time limit. The State then filed a motion for reconsideration
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16577 - 2017-09-21
State v. Larry G. Edwards
)). The court of appeals reasoned: The trial court dismissed because the State failed to comply with the speedy
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16577 - 2005-03-31
)). The court of appeals reasoned: The trial court dismissed because the State failed to comply with the speedy
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16577 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
by taking action outweigh the best interest to the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.” Sec
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1089274 - 2026-03-11
by taking action outweigh the best interest to the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.” Sec
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1089274 - 2026-03-11
State v. Alfred J. Spears
. Spears describes them as requests for a speedy trial, bond hearing and dismissal of his attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13778 - 2005-03-31
. Spears describes them as requests for a speedy trial, bond hearing and dismissal of his attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13778 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a speedy trial, and a trial was initially scheduled to begin on June 1, 2016. One week before
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=260258 - 2020-05-19
a speedy trial, and a trial was initially scheduled to begin on June 1, 2016. One week before
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=260258 - 2020-05-19
COURT OF APPEALS
. See id. ¶16 Maus contends he was denied his right to a speedy trial. To demonstrate a speedy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115637 - 2014-06-30
. See id. ¶16 Maus contends he was denied his right to a speedy trial. To demonstrate a speedy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115637 - 2014-06-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
right to a speedy trial. To demonstrate a speedy trial violation, Maus must identify the various
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=115637 - 2017-09-21
right to a speedy trial. To demonstrate a speedy trial violation, Maus must identify the various
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=115637 - 2017-09-21