Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 631 - 640 of 20855 for word.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
), is “a function word to indicate belonging or a possessive relationship.” See MERRIAM-WEBSTER’S COLLEGIATE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101759 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that the trial court improperly substituted the word “between” for the word “after” when it responded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149311 - 2017-09-21

State v. Kenneth S. Meidenbauer
of the handbook that he cites does not “define” a U-turn as that word is used in Wis. Stat. § 346.33. Rather
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3623 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
N.W.2d 110 (quoted source omitted). We give effect to each word in the statute that we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=176594 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, 382, 480 N.W.2d 1 (1992). The fact that a word has more than one meaning, however, does not make
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86226 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
and ordinary meaning of the phrase “business activities” or either of its component words. See Weimer v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134853 - 2015-02-11

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
activities” or either of its component words. See Weimer v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 216 Wis. 2d 705, 722
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134853 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
as to its applicability.” State v. Tronca, 84 Wis. 2d 68, 86, 267 N.W.2d 216 (1978). In other words, those
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99893 - 2013-07-24

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that his actions and words constituted a refusal. This court affirms. I. BACKGROUND ¶2 In June
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=815559 - 2024-06-19

[PDF] WI APP 82
that the circuit court correctly gave the word “custody” its common No. 2009AP1997 6 meaning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50439 - 2014-09-15