Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6301 - 6310 of 98503 for court records search online.

2008 WI APP 19
that the circuit court erred in denying her motion to suppress evidence obtained during a search of her person
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31607 - 2008-02-19

[PDF] NOTICE
, the court rejected Harris’s attempt to re-open the record for the taking of new evidence. Harris now
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50188 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Leonard L. Jones v. State
in the record. Since the circuit court proceeded to rule on Jones’s request, however, issuing a written order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13259 - 2017-09-21

Leonard L. Jones v. State
seized at the scene of his arrest. After finding the arrest and search to be valid, the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13259 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Frontsheet
in the audiovisual recording was inconsistent with the officer's testimony; specifically, that the circuit court
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192412 - 2017-09-27

[PDF] CA Blank Order
the circuit court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion. Our review of the record satisfies us
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=546897 - 2022-07-27

Frontsheet
requirement? ¶4 The court concludes that although the first warrantless search of the defendant's bedroom
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33346 - 2008-07-08

[PDF] WI 85
the "search incident to arrest" exception to the Fourth Amendment warrant requirement. The court further
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33346 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Eric K. Graf
Following a search of online records available through the Wisconsin Court System's Consolidated Court
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16661 - 2017-09-21

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Eric K. Graf
Following a search of online records available through the Wisconsin Court System's Consolidated Court
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16661 - 2005-03-31