Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6301 - 6310 of 64852 for records.
Search results 6301 - 6310 of 64852 for records.
State v. James F. Karls
the private attorney for financial reasons and would be proceeding pro se. There is nothing in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13728 - 2005-03-31
the private attorney for financial reasons and would be proceeding pro se. There is nothing in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13728 - 2005-03-31
State v. Thomas M. Stockland
that were on the calendar on that date, and the particular discussions that were had on the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5541 - 2005-03-31
that were on the calendar on that date, and the particular discussions that were had on the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5541 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, and we have independently reviewed the record. We conclude that no arguably meritorious issues exist
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172523 - 2017-09-21
, and we have independently reviewed the record. We conclude that no arguably meritorious issues exist
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172523 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Nils V. Holmgren
the owner. No. 98-3405-CR 3 I. BACKGROUND The limited record before us reveals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14826 - 2017-09-21
the owner. No. 98-3405-CR 3 I. BACKGROUND The limited record before us reveals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14826 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Colleen M. Novak
witness with regard to a tape-recorded statement previously given by the witness. We reject Novak’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20128 - 2017-09-21
witness with regard to a tape-recorded statement previously given by the witness. We reject Novak’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20128 - 2017-09-21
Alice J. Heise v. Carl P. Heise
erroneously calculated his income available for child support purposes. Because the record fails to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7402 - 2005-03-31
erroneously calculated his income available for child support purposes. Because the record fails to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7402 - 2005-03-31
State v. Leonard J. LaRoche, Jr.
It is not clear from the record why almost six months elapsed between the filing of the motion and the entry
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2295 - 2005-03-31
It is not clear from the record why almost six months elapsed between the filing of the motion and the entry
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2295 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
]he police reports talk about a DVD recording.” 4 However, the State asserted, “[T]here’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103799 - 2017-09-21
]he police reports talk about a DVD recording.” 4 However, the State asserted, “[T]here’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103799 - 2017-09-21
Michael T. Mulqueen v. Barbara Geller
: (a) the oral stipulation placed on the record pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 807.05 (1999-2000) was not valid;[3] (b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3812 - 2005-03-31
: (a) the oral stipulation placed on the record pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 807.05 (1999-2000) was not valid;[3] (b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3812 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Thomas M. Stockland
discussions that were had on the record. ¶8 After this, the court determined that because a transcript
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5541 - 2017-09-19
discussions that were had on the record. ¶8 After this, the court determined that because a transcript
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5541 - 2017-09-19