Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6311 - 6320 of 74480 for public records.

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
modification. On appeal, he challenges his sentence. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94447 - 2014-09-15

CA Blank Order
. Milwaukee, WI 53233 Randall E. Paulson Asst. State Public Defender 735 N. Water St., #912 Milwaukee, WI
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135179 - 2015-02-12

97-04 Amendment of Parts of SCR 70 and 71 and 32
ORDER No. 97-04 The court held a public hearing September 9, 1997 on the petition of the Director
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=1193 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Lee R. Krahenbuhl, DDS v. Wisconsin Dentistry Examining Board
, the DEB needed to determine, and articulate in the record, that the methods he used to diagnose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24556 - 2017-09-21

Lee R. Krahenbuhl, DDS v. Wisconsin Dentistry Examining Board
, the DEB needed to determine, and articulate in the record, that the methods he used to diagnose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24556 - 2006-04-25

[PDF] Rules petiion 07-09 revised draft
for certified copies of records in any 236 public office, postage, telephoning, depositions and copies
/supreme/docs/0709revision3.pdf - 2010-05-25

[PDF] NOTICE
, a pulmonologist, reviewed Avina’s medical records. Dr. Levy also reviewed medical publications on exposure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34482 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Harold Richard Nero
not “state for the record why this lengthy and near-maximum sentence was appropriate.” He points
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7578 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
. Publication in the official reports is not recommended. [1] In a 1994 recorded statement, Avina said
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34482 - 2008-11-03

State v. Damonta J. Jones
512 (1971). A strong public policy exists against interfering with the trial court’s discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18288 - 2005-05-31