Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 63101 - 63110 of 68988 for had.
Search results 63101 - 63110 of 68988 for had.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that Paskel had completed a guilty plea questionnaire and waiver of rights form and that she understood its
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252488 - 2020-01-13
that Paskel had completed a guilty plea questionnaire and waiver of rights form and that she understood its
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252488 - 2020-01-13
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
; and he had new evidence. The circuit court denied the motion after a hearing and this appeal follows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85754 - 2014-09-15
; and he had new evidence. The circuit court denied the motion after a hearing and this appeal follows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85754 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
plainly had nothing to do with the Department of Corrections or its treatment of Henderson and it would
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173142 - 2017-09-21
plainly had nothing to do with the Department of Corrections or its treatment of Henderson and it would
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173142 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
court had discretion in determining whether to impose the surcharge in all other felony cases. See
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141632 - 2017-09-21
court had discretion in determining whether to impose the surcharge in all other felony cases. See
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141632 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
resentencing. At resentencing, trial counsel stated that he had explained to Olmstead that because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109035 - 2017-09-21
resentencing. At resentencing, trial counsel stated that he had explained to Olmstead that because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109035 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Bill Youa Sue Vang v. Mai Y. Vang
in October 2002. The court concluded that Chang and Ia had retained an unreasonable amount
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26078 - 2017-09-21
in October 2002. The court concluded that Chang and Ia had retained an unreasonable amount
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26078 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
: (1) J.L.A. was under eighteen years old; (2) L.L.B. had legal custody of J.L.A. under a court order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=804986 - 2024-05-23
: (1) J.L.A. was under eighteen years old; (2) L.L.B. had legal custody of J.L.A. under a court order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=804986 - 2024-05-23
COURT OF APPEALS
had not yet occurred. The court indicated the motion might be refiled as a postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123856 - 2014-10-14
had not yet occurred. The court indicated the motion might be refiled as a postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123856 - 2014-10-14
CA Blank Order
, and that the State had met its burden of proof by clear and convincing evidence. Accordingly, the court denied
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102021 - 2013-09-12
, and that the State had met its burden of proof by clear and convincing evidence. Accordingly, the court denied
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102021 - 2013-09-12
Cle A. Gray, Jr. v. Donald Gudmanson
, 562 (Ct. App. 1983). [2] Apparently, the padlock had at one point been fashioned into a weapon called
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11574 - 2005-03-31
, 562 (Ct. App. 1983). [2] Apparently, the padlock had at one point been fashioned into a weapon called
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11574 - 2005-03-31