Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 63201 - 63210 of 83088 for simple case search.
Search results 63201 - 63210 of 83088 for simple case search.
State v. William Warner Davis
of law applicable to the case. State v. McCoy, 143 Wis.2d 274, 289, 421 N.W.2d 107, 112 (1988
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8765 - 2005-03-31
of law applicable to the case. State v. McCoy, 143 Wis.2d 274, 289, 421 N.W.2d 107, 112 (1988
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8765 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at sentencing. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=772692 - 2024-03-05
at sentencing. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=772692 - 2024-03-05
William J. Evers v. Eric A. Stearn
trial. After Evers rested his case against Stearn, Stearn moved for directed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9825 - 2005-03-31
trial. After Evers rested his case against Stearn, Stearn moved for directed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9825 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
different.” Id. at 694. In the context of a case resolved by entry of a plea, the prejudice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1050844 - 2025-12-17
different.” Id. at 694. In the context of a case resolved by entry of a plea, the prejudice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1050844 - 2025-12-17
[PDF]
Gary Timm v. John Robey
judgment granted when it failed to answer. The underlying action in this case was a personal injury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10829 - 2017-09-20
judgment granted when it failed to answer. The underlying action in this case was a personal injury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10829 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Robert Fritsch
in this case was the sentencing date. This court agrees and affirms the judgment. ¶2 The relevant facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2688 - 2017-09-19
in this case was the sentencing date. This court agrees and affirms the judgment. ¶2 The relevant facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2688 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21(1) (2021-22).2 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=731477 - 2023-11-22
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21(1) (2021-22).2 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=731477 - 2023-11-22
_WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS
, except to support a claim of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, or law of the case. Per curiam opinions
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70959 - 2011-09-12
, except to support a claim of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, or law of the case. Per curiam opinions
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70959 - 2011-09-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107783 - 2017-09-21
the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107783 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Dennis E. Jones
perjury in a Kenosha County criminal action. The Kenosha County case charged Jones with armed robbery
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9934 - 2017-09-19
perjury in a Kenosha County criminal action. The Kenosha County case charged Jones with armed robbery
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9934 - 2017-09-19