Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 63271 - 63280 of 68579 for law.
Search results 63271 - 63280 of 68579 for law.
Raymond S. Selje v. Village of North Freedom
and substantive law.' Waushara County v. Graf, 166 Wis.2d 442, 452, 480 N.W.2d 16, 20 (1992), quoting Faretta v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9034 - 2005-03-31
and substantive law.' Waushara County v. Graf, 166 Wis.2d 442, 452, 480 N.W.2d 16, 20 (1992), quoting Faretta v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9034 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
-of-venue orders were “void as a matter of law” because the Marquette County social worker who signed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1050883 - 2025-12-18
-of-venue orders were “void as a matter of law” because the Marquette County social worker who signed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1050883 - 2025-12-18
COURT OF APPEALS
[is] a question of law that we [decide] de novo.” Id., ¶10. ¶9 To make a prima facie showing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101959 - 2013-09-16
[is] a question of law that we [decide] de novo.” Id., ¶10. ¶9 To make a prima facie showing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101959 - 2013-09-16
State v. Joseph F. Michalkiewicz
intentional homicide. He argues that his conviction violates due process of law because the State did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21090 - 2006-01-31
intentional homicide. He argues that his conviction violates due process of law because the State did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21090 - 2006-01-31
The Estate of Rita Engebose v. Moraine Ridge Limited Partnership
as long as the court “examined the relevant facts, applied a proper standard of law and, using
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14666 - 2005-03-31
as long as the court “examined the relevant facts, applied a proper standard of law and, using
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14666 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
and substantial are questions of law.’” State v. Liukonen, 2004 WI App 157, ¶9, 276 Wis. 2d 64, 686 N.W.2d 689
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143202 - 2015-06-22
and substantial are questions of law.’” State v. Liukonen, 2004 WI App 157, ¶9, 276 Wis. 2d 64, 686 N.W.2d 689
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143202 - 2015-06-22
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
6 that the defendant is entitled to no relief is also a question of law [that] we review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=989591 - 2025-07-30
6 that the defendant is entitled to no relief is also a question of law [that] we review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=989591 - 2025-07-30
COURT OF APPEALS
, and we therefore are presented only with a question of law. See id. Discussion ¶7 Helmeke argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31948 - 2008-02-27
, and we therefore are presented only with a question of law. See id. Discussion ¶7 Helmeke argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31948 - 2008-02-27
State v. Michael P. Stefko
to proceed pro se occurs by operation of law, not by virtue of the individual's express verbal consent. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10097 - 2005-03-31
to proceed pro se occurs by operation of law, not by virtue of the individual's express verbal consent. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10097 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
conclusions of law thereon.” Wis. Stat. § 805.17(2). On appeal, a party may raise “the question
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139882 - 2015-04-21
conclusions of law thereon.” Wis. Stat. § 805.17(2). On appeal, a party may raise “the question
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139882 - 2015-04-21