Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6331 - 6340 of 64178 for records/1000.
Search results 6331 - 6340 of 64178 for records/1000.
State v. Larry D. Cook
to respond to the report and has elected not to respond. Upon our independent review of the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10362 - 2005-03-31
to respond to the report and has elected not to respond. Upon our independent review of the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10362 - 2005-03-31
State v. Byron D. Mitchell
this court to reject the no merit report. After an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11396 - 2005-03-31
this court to reject the no merit report. After an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11396 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record, we conclude that there is no arguable merit to any issue that could be raised on appeal. Lloyd
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1022586 - 2025-10-16
of the record, we conclude that there is no arguable merit to any issue that could be raised on appeal. Lloyd
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1022586 - 2025-10-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record, we conclude that there is no arguable merit to any issue that could be raised on appeal. Lloyd
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1022586 - 2025-10-16
of the record, we conclude that there is no arguable merit to any issue that could be raised on appeal. Lloyd
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1022586 - 2025-10-16
Jerry Saenz v. Gary McCaughtry
. We reject the argument. The record is silent as to whether the officer was wearing glasses. Saenz
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14336 - 2005-03-31
. We reject the argument. The record is silent as to whether the officer was wearing glasses. Saenz
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14336 - 2005-03-31
Harold Larson v. Forest Hill Memorial Park
of the presiding judge's unwarranted impatience, for which he at one point apologized on the record, determined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10922 - 2005-03-31
of the presiding judge's unwarranted impatience, for which he at one point apologized on the record, determined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10922 - 2005-03-31
Unnamed Person No.1 v. State
with respect to those actions. The court of appeals sealed the records, then certified these matters
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16572 - 2005-03-31
with respect to those actions. The court of appeals sealed the records, then certified these matters
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16572 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Unnamed Person No.1 v. State
of appeals sealed the records, then certified these matters to this court because of concerns
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16572 - 2017-09-21
of appeals sealed the records, then certified these matters to this court because of concerns
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16572 - 2017-09-21
Unnamed Person No. 2 v. State
with respect to those actions. The court of appeals sealed the records, then certified these matters
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16593 - 2005-03-31
with respect to those actions. The court of appeals sealed the records, then certified these matters
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16593 - 2005-03-31
Unnamed Person No. 3 v. State
with respect to those actions. The court of appeals sealed the records, then certified these matters
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16607 - 2005-03-31
with respect to those actions. The court of appeals sealed the records, then certified these matters
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16607 - 2005-03-31