Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6341 - 6350 of 63734 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 6341 - 6350 of 63734 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
addresses a suppression motion, counsel’s performance, Griffith’s pleas and his sentences. Griffith
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207485 - 2018-01-22
addresses a suppression motion, counsel’s performance, Griffith’s pleas and his sentences. Griffith
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207485 - 2018-01-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
-CR 2 judgment of conviction and an order denying her motion for postconviction relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=286349 - 2020-09-10
-CR 2 judgment of conviction and an order denying her motion for postconviction relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=286349 - 2020-09-10
[PDF]
State v. Tammy E. Millerleile
2 on the ground that she was in custody and the police had not advised her of her Miranda 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6007 - 2017-09-19
2 on the ground that she was in custody and the police had not advised her of her Miranda 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6007 - 2017-09-19
State v. Tammy E. Millerleile
on the ground that she was in custody and the police had not advised her of her Miranda[1] rights. The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6007 - 2005-03-31
on the ground that she was in custody and the police had not advised her of her Miranda[1] rights. The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6007 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
in 2008CF2979. On August 12, 2009, Applings, by counsel, filed a postconviction motion asking the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56505 - 2010-11-08
in 2008CF2979. On August 12, 2009, Applings, by counsel, filed a postconviction motion asking the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56505 - 2010-11-08
[PDF]
NOTICE
, Wingrove, on behalf of Dakota, filed a Motion to Dismiss the Petition for Failure to Comply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48272 - 2014-09-15
, Wingrove, on behalf of Dakota, filed a Motion to Dismiss the Petition for Failure to Comply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48272 - 2014-09-15
09AP2667 State v. Dakota A.K.
. ¶7 On July 22, 2009, Wingrove, on behalf of Dakota, filed a Motion to Dismiss the Petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48272 - 2010-03-23
. ¶7 On July 22, 2009, Wingrove, on behalf of Dakota, filed a Motion to Dismiss the Petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48272 - 2010-03-23
[PDF]
NOTICE
in 2008CF2979. The Honorable Carl Ashley reviewed and denied the motion seeking postconviction relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56505 - 2014-09-15
in 2008CF2979. The Honorable Carl Ashley reviewed and denied the motion seeking postconviction relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56505 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
denying his motion for postconviction relief.[2] Brown argues that he is entitled to a new trial because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34166 - 2008-09-29
denying his motion for postconviction relief.[2] Brown argues that he is entitled to a new trial because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34166 - 2008-09-29
COURT OF APPEALS
denying his postconviction motion that State v. Jerrell C.J., 2005 WI 105, 283 Wis. 2d 145, 699 N.W.2d 110
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29128 - 2007-06-26
denying his postconviction motion that State v. Jerrell C.J., 2005 WI 105, 283 Wis. 2d 145, 699 N.W.2d 110
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29128 - 2007-06-26