Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6341 - 6350 of 63360 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 6341 - 6350 of 63360 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
Eugene J. Fliss v. Corrine T. Fliss
(the Fliss heirs), appeal from an order denying their motion to: (1) declare that the real and personal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9057 - 2017-09-19
(the Fliss heirs), appeal from an order denying their motion to: (1) declare that the real and personal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9057 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
appeals from an order denying a portion of his postconviction motion. Appellate counsel, Attorney
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195592 - 2017-09-21
appeals from an order denying a portion of his postconviction motion. Appellate counsel, Attorney
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195592 - 2017-09-21
State v. Hakam F. Hamdan
postconviction motion for sentence modification. Hamdan claims that the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12408 - 2005-03-31
postconviction motion for sentence modification. Hamdan claims that the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12408 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
conduct case, were dismissed as read-ins at sentencing. A joint sentencing recommendation was made
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=182004 - 2017-09-21
conduct case, were dismissed as read-ins at sentencing. A joint sentencing recommendation was made
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=182004 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
of a change in the security level of his custodial classification. We affirm for the reasons discussed below
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110580 - 2014-04-23
of a change in the security level of his custodial classification. We affirm for the reasons discussed below
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110580 - 2014-04-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that denied his petition for certiorari review of a change in the security level of his custodial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110580 - 2017-09-21
that denied his petition for certiorari review of a change in the security level of his custodial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110580 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and began a two-day trial to the court. Villegas remained in State custody throughout the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81728 - 2014-09-15
and began a two-day trial to the court. Villegas remained in State custody throughout the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81728 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
trial to the court. Villegas remained in State custody throughout the time that the petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81728 - 2014-04-30
trial to the court. Villegas remained in State custody throughout the time that the petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81728 - 2014-04-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, the children were placed with a maternal aunt under an order for temporary physical custody. Don and Diana
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=550559 - 2022-08-02
, the children were placed with a maternal aunt under an order for temporary physical custody. Don and Diana
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=550559 - 2022-08-02
[PDF]
Catherine M. Thomas Correspondence
practitioners in Wisconsin, I respectfully request that the Court approve the joint petition submitted
/scrules/docs/0604thomas.pdf - 2024-04-02
practitioners in Wisconsin, I respectfully request that the Court approve the joint petition submitted
/scrules/docs/0604thomas.pdf - 2024-04-02