Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6341 - 6350 of 30118 for consulta de causas.
Search results 6341 - 6350 of 30118 for consulta de causas.
City of New Berlin v. Kenneth Pollich
. Pollich appealed to the Waukesha County Circuit Court, requesting a jury trial. That trial was de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8761 - 2005-03-31
. Pollich appealed to the Waukesha County Circuit Court, requesting a jury trial. That trial was de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8761 - 2005-03-31
Frontsheet
a referee's findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30176 - 2007-09-04
a referee's findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30176 - 2007-09-04
Rashid A. Osman v. Allen R. Phipps
. App. 1992). We review the trial court’s decision granting summary judgment de novo. See Germanotta v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14624 - 2005-03-31
. App. 1992). We review the trial court’s decision granting summary judgment de novo. See Germanotta v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14624 - 2005-03-31
State v. Edward L. Wilson
review de novo. Id. ¶5 Wilson’s postconviction motion alleged that his trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15642 - 2005-03-31
review de novo. Id. ¶5 Wilson’s postconviction motion alleged that his trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15642 - 2005-03-31
Town of Oconomowoc v. Maurice Mihelich
. However, whether a stop meets statutory and constitutional standards is a question of law subject to de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9875 - 2005-03-31
. However, whether a stop meets statutory and constitutional standards is a question of law subject to de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9875 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
exercised its discretion, and another time it states the test is de novo, but the report never cites
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92104 - 2014-09-15
exercised its discretion, and another time it states the test is de novo, but the report never cites
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92104 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law we review de novo. Butzlaff v. DHFS, 223 Wis. 2d 673, 679, 590 N.W.2d 9 (Ct. App. 1998
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101759 - 2013-09-10
is a question of law we review de novo. Butzlaff v. DHFS, 223 Wis. 2d 673, 679, 590 N.W.2d 9 (Ct. App. 1998
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101759 - 2013-09-10
COURT OF APPEALS
facts, however, is a question of law which we review de novo. Id. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29258 - 2007-06-05
facts, however, is a question of law which we review de novo. Id. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29258 - 2007-06-05
Andrew S. Zieve v. Ness
(1987). In summary judgment cases, we review the matter de novo. United States Fidelity and Guar. Co
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9361 - 2005-03-31
(1987). In summary judgment cases, we review the matter de novo. United States Fidelity and Guar. Co
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9361 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo. State v. Williams, 198 Wis. 2d 516, 525, 544 N.W.2d 406 (1996). ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31589 - 2008-01-22
review de novo. State v. Williams, 198 Wis. 2d 516, 525, 544 N.W.2d 406 (1996). ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31589 - 2008-01-22