Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6341 - 6350 of 74479 for public records.
Search results 6341 - 6350 of 74479 for public records.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and prior record, and the need to protect the public. See State v. Harris, 119 Wis. 2d 612, 623-24, 350
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140855 - 2017-09-21
and prior record, and the need to protect the public. See State v. Harris, 119 Wis. 2d 612, 623-24, 350
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140855 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). McToy filed a response. After reviewing the record, counsel’s no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103117 - 2013-10-22
. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). McToy filed a response. After reviewing the record, counsel’s no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103117 - 2013-10-22
CA Blank Order
a response, and has elected not to do so. After reviewing the record and counsel’s report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=127874 - 2014-11-18
a response, and has elected not to do so. After reviewing the record and counsel’s report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=127874 - 2014-11-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
reviewing the record and counsel’s report, we conclude that there are no issues with arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214494 - 2018-06-20
reviewing the record and counsel’s report, we conclude that there are no issues with arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214494 - 2018-06-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174723 - 2017-09-21
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174723 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
not to do so. After reviewing the record 1 All
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91667 - 2014-09-15
not to do so. After reviewing the record 1 All
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91667 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
, and has elected not to do so. After reviewing the record and counsel’s report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92070 - 2013-01-29
, and has elected not to do so. After reviewing the record and counsel’s report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92070 - 2013-01-29
CA Blank Order
to the no-merit report and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95889 - 2013-04-29
to the no-merit report and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95889 - 2013-04-29
CA Blank Order
, was advised of his right to file a response, and has elected not to do so. After reviewing the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=146239 - 2015-08-18
, was advised of his right to file a response, and has elected not to do so. After reviewing the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=146239 - 2015-08-18
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
of his right to file a response, and has elected not to do so. After reviewing the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95700 - 2014-09-15
of his right to file a response, and has elected not to do so. After reviewing the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95700 - 2014-09-15