Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 63491 - 63500 of 84057 for simple case search.
Search results 63491 - 63500 of 84057 for simple case search.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2023-24).1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1109112 - 2026-04-28
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2023-24).1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1109112 - 2026-04-28
State v. Terry V. Anderson
agreement in this case was in fact a security subject to Wisconsin securities law; (2) the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9533 - 2005-03-31
agreement in this case was in fact a security subject to Wisconsin securities law; (2) the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9533 - 2005-03-31
Janet M. Evans v. Timothy D. Heitman, M.D.
their case file and thus had not yet made an appointment with the judgment clerk for perfection
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14112 - 2005-03-31
their case file and thus had not yet made an appointment with the judgment clerk for perfection
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14112 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
then found Hudacek competent to proceed. Hudacek’s case proceeded to a jury trial in March 2023. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=958252 - 2025-05-20
then found Hudacek competent to proceed. Hudacek’s case proceeded to a jury trial in March 2023. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=958252 - 2025-05-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
recommendation to the court: The State at this point when we talk about case 13CF532, we’re asking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180664 - 2017-09-21
recommendation to the court: The State at this point when we talk about case 13CF532, we’re asking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180664 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
criminal case. We will not discuss that portion of the postconviction motion or the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=125288 - 2017-09-21
criminal case. We will not discuss that portion of the postconviction motion or the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=125288 - 2017-09-21
State v. Eva M. Bakken
nature that the state intends to use at trial that were taken in this case. The report doesn't speak
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8461 - 2005-03-31
nature that the state intends to use at trial that were taken in this case. The report doesn't speak
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8461 - 2005-03-31
State v. Michael L. Morris
as the [assistant district attorney] handling this case[,] prior to her ascension to the bench,” she imposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3614 - 2005-03-31
as the [assistant district attorney] handling this case[,] prior to her ascension to the bench,” she imposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3614 - 2005-03-31
State v. Robert J. Capps
N.W.2d at 24. In this case, the trial court asked Capps if he were “willing to acknowledge that … [he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12302 - 2005-03-31
N.W.2d at 24. In this case, the trial court asked Capps if he were “willing to acknowledge that … [he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12302 - 2005-03-31
Eddie Crews v. Freeman Roofing, Inc.
dismissed his entire case. Crews argues that the trial court erred because Freeman Roofing, Inc. (Freeman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2261 - 2005-03-31
dismissed his entire case. Crews argues that the trial court erred because Freeman Roofing, Inc. (Freeman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2261 - 2005-03-31