Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6351 - 6360 of 64566 for b's.
Search results 6351 - 6360 of 64566 for b's.
COURT OF APPEALS
, Phillip B. Briski, Stephan E. Kuehn, Lonny Benbo, Craig L. Hull, Donald Cupery, Christopher Davis, Jon K
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121148 - 2014-09-09
, Phillip B. Briski, Stephan E. Kuehn, Lonny Benbo, Craig L. Hull, Donald Cupery, Christopher Davis, Jon K
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121148 - 2014-09-09
City of Madison v. Jens W.L. Hinrichsen
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Dane County: SARAH B. O’BRIEN, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11375 - 2005-03-31
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Dane County: SARAH B. O’BRIEN, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11375 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Christopher M.
. (b) In this subsection, “substantial parental relationship” means the acceptance and exercise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7368 - 2017-09-20
. (b) In this subsection, “substantial parental relationship” means the acceptance and exercise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7368 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
WI APP 60
presumption of paternity relative to WIS. STAT. § 891.41(1)(b). ¶7 The issue in this case involves
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32131 - 2014-09-15
presumption of paternity relative to WIS. STAT. § 891.41(1)(b). ¶7 The issue in this case involves
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32131 - 2014-09-15
State v. Jorge T.
)(a) and (b), and 939.63(1)(a), Stats., and party to the crime of obstructing an officer contrary to §§ 946.41
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14190 - 2005-03-31
)(a) and (b), and 939.63(1)(a), Stats., and party to the crime of obstructing an officer contrary to §§ 946.41
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14190 - 2005-03-31
95-05 SCR Chapter 60
. (b) Make recommendations to the supreme court for amendment to the code of judicial conduct
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=1034 - 2005-03-31
. (b) Make recommendations to the supreme court for amendment to the code of judicial conduct
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=1034 - 2005-03-31
Frontsheet
decision regarding representation, contrary to SCR 20:1.4(b)[6] (Count Three); engaged in conduct involving
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=146523 - 2015-08-17
decision regarding representation, contrary to SCR 20:1.4(b)[6] (Count Three); engaged in conduct involving
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=146523 - 2015-08-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. STAT. §§ 948.02(1); 939.50(3)(b); and 973.01(1) (1997-98). He was convicted of committing repeated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104668 - 2017-09-21
. STAT. §§ 948.02(1); 939.50(3)(b); and 973.01(1) (1997-98). He was convicted of committing repeated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104668 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Jessie L. Stokes
years’ extended supervision. See WIS. STAT. §§ 940.225(1)(b) (2003-04) 3 (classifying first-degree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26400 - 2017-09-21
years’ extended supervision. See WIS. STAT. §§ 940.225(1)(b) (2003-04) 3 (classifying first-degree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26400 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Michael J. Jordan
admissible, see WIS. STAT. § 908.01(4)(b)1 & 4; (2) even if not admissible, Cardosa’s statements were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6508 - 2017-09-19
admissible, see WIS. STAT. § 908.01(4)(b)1 & 4; (2) even if not admissible, Cardosa’s statements were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6508 - 2017-09-19