Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6351 - 6360 of 30118 for consulta de causas.
Search results 6351 - 6360 of 30118 for consulta de causas.
COURT OF APPEALS
exists is a question of law reviewed de novo. State v. Delaney, 2006 WI App 37, ¶7, 289 Wis. 2d 714, 712
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33548 - 2008-07-29
exists is a question of law reviewed de novo. State v. Delaney, 2006 WI App 37, ¶7, 289 Wis. 2d 714, 712
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33548 - 2008-07-29
[PDF]
NOTICE
erroneous. Id. We review the determination of reasonable suspicion de novo. State v. Williams, 2001 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=37712 - 2014-09-15
erroneous. Id. We review the determination of reasonable suspicion de novo. State v. Williams, 2001 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=37712 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Njari Crosby v. James H. Anderson
to a failure to prosecute her motion. ¶7 Crosby moved the trial court for de novo review of the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7514 - 2017-09-19
to a failure to prosecute her motion. ¶7 Crosby moved the trial court for de novo review of the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7514 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Weber Leicht Gohr & Associates v. Bank One
in § 802.08(2), STATS., to the record de novo. See Garcia v. Regent Ins. Co., 167 Wis.2d 287, 294, 418 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13152 - 2017-09-21
in § 802.08(2), STATS., to the record de novo. See Garcia v. Regent Ins. Co., 167 Wis.2d 287, 294, 418 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13152 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
judgment de novo. Chapman v. B.C. Ziegler & Co., 2013 WI App 127, ¶2, 351 Wis. 2d 123, 839 N.W.2d 425
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138247 - 2017-09-21
judgment de novo. Chapman v. B.C. Ziegler & Co., 2013 WI App 127, ¶2, 351 Wis. 2d 123, 839 N.W.2d 425
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138247 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
will uphold the circuit court’s findings of historical fact unless clearly erroneous; however, we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92582 - 2014-09-15
will uphold the circuit court’s findings of historical fact unless clearly erroneous; however, we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92582 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
District II April 15, 2015 To: Hon. Linda M. Van De Water Circuit Court Judge Waukesha County
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139597 - 2015-04-14
District II April 15, 2015 To: Hon. Linda M. Van De Water Circuit Court Judge Waukesha County
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139597 - 2015-04-14
COURT OF APPEALS
and ordered Hambly to reimburse Lewis $300 for costs. Hambly appeals. ¶4 This court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85981 - 2012-08-14
and ordered Hambly to reimburse Lewis $300 for costs. Hambly appeals. ¶4 This court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85981 - 2012-08-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a court’s findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous, and we review de novo the application
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1017776 - 2025-10-02
a court’s findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous, and we review de novo the application
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1017776 - 2025-10-02
[PDF]
Andrew S. Zieve v. Ness
.2d 304, 315, 401 N.W.2d 816, 820 (1987). In summary judgment cases, we review the matter de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9361 - 2017-09-19
.2d 304, 315, 401 N.W.2d 816, 820 (1987). In summary judgment cases, we review the matter de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9361 - 2017-09-19