Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6351 - 6360 of 33271 for summary.
Search results 6351 - 6360 of 33271 for summary.
COURT OF APPEALS
granting summary judgment in favor of the City of Milwaukee, rejecting Evaluators’ claim for a personal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80188 - 2012-03-28
granting summary judgment in favor of the City of Milwaukee, rejecting Evaluators’ claim for a personal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80188 - 2012-03-28
[PDF]
NOTICE
the agreement void and unenforceable for noncompliance with WIS. STAT. § 103.4652 and granting summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30933 - 2014-09-15
the agreement void and unenforceable for noncompliance with WIS. STAT. § 103.4652 and granting summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30933 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
, the small claims limit. ¶3 Hintz moved for summary judgment and sought dismissal. He admitted that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34251 - 2014-09-15
, the small claims limit. ¶3 Hintz moved for summary judgment and sought dismissal. He admitted that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34251 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of Reinhart Foodservice, LLC, after the circuit court denied Bouraxis’s motion for summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214488 - 2018-06-19
of Reinhart Foodservice, LLC, after the circuit court denied Bouraxis’s motion for summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214488 - 2018-06-19
[PDF]
Otis Elevator Co. v. Fulcrum Construction Co.
Fulcrum moved for summary judgment, which the trial court granted. The trial court held that approval
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25979 - 2017-09-21
Fulcrum moved for summary judgment, which the trial court granted. The trial court held that approval
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25979 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
. [§ 1983]. ¶6 The City subsequently filed a motion for summary judgment on the underlying complaint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35245 - 2014-09-15
. [§ 1983]. ¶6 The City subsequently filed a motion for summary judgment on the underlying complaint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35245 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
and unenforceable for noncompliance with Wis. Stat. § 103.465[2] and granting summary judgment in Alger’s favor. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30933 - 2007-11-20
and unenforceable for noncompliance with Wis. Stat. § 103.465[2] and granting summary judgment in Alger’s favor. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30933 - 2007-11-20
2008 WI APP 85
., Peterson and Brunner, JJ. ¶1 HOOVER, P.J. Wallace Hilliard appeals a summary judgment awarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32637 - 2008-06-24
., Peterson and Brunner, JJ. ¶1 HOOVER, P.J. Wallace Hilliard appeals a summary judgment awarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32637 - 2008-06-24
[PDF]
Begin Date:
Begin Date: End Date: 01-01-2013 12-31-2013 Caseload Summary by Responsible Court Official
/publications/statistics/circuit/docs/caseloadcounty13.pdf - 2014-03-24
Begin Date: End Date: 01-01-2013 12-31-2013 Caseload Summary by Responsible Court Official
/publications/statistics/circuit/docs/caseloadcounty13.pdf - 2014-03-24
[PDF]
United States District Court for the District of Columbia Order
in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is ORDERED that the defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment, Dkt. 26
/supreme/docs/us_distcourt_dcord.pdf - 2021-05-21
in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is ORDERED that the defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment, Dkt. 26
/supreme/docs/us_distcourt_dcord.pdf - 2021-05-21