Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 63681 - 63690 of 83139 for simple case search.
Search results 63681 - 63690 of 83139 for simple case search.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
alike.”5 The will does not define the disputed phrase “residual heirs.” We now consider whether case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=514567 - 2022-04-28
alike.”5 The will does not define the disputed phrase “residual heirs.” We now consider whether case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=514567 - 2022-04-28
[PDF]
WI APP 121
2013 WI APP 121 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2012AP2294
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102007 - 2017-09-21
2013 WI APP 121 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2012AP2294
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102007 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Synthia O'Grady v. Michael S. O'Grady
to challenge additional orders entered under the same case number: (1) a May 17, 2004 order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18370 - 2017-09-21
to challenge additional orders entered under the same case number: (1) a May 17, 2004 order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18370 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the case includes primarily verbatim Q & A trial testimony, but nonetheless omits relevant evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85592 - 2014-09-15
of the case includes primarily verbatim Q & A trial testimony, but nonetheless omits relevant evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85592 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
deputy—and Gutierrez were the only witnesses to testify at the court trial related to this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173922 - 2017-09-21
deputy—and Gutierrez were the only witnesses to testify at the court trial related to this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173922 - 2017-09-21
Synthia O'Grady v. Michael S. O'Grady
case number: (1) a May 17, 2004 order discharging the guardian ad litem and requiring reimbursement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18370 - 2005-05-31
case number: (1) a May 17, 2004 order discharging the guardian ad litem and requiring reimbursement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18370 - 2005-05-31
[PDF]
Pioneer Roofing, Inc. v. Westra/Construction, Inc.
court erred in its quantum meruit ruling for three reasons. First, it maintains that case law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15579 - 2017-09-21
court erred in its quantum meruit ruling for three reasons. First, it maintains that case law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15579 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
within the one-year period required under WIS. STAT. § 806.07(2). Finally, each case regarding motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=987276 - 2025-07-22
within the one-year period required under WIS. STAT. § 806.07(2). Finally, each case regarding motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=987276 - 2025-07-22
State v. Maurice L. Floyd
Floyd’s reliance on Gary M.B. is misplaced. In that case, we determined that a defendant did not waive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7419 - 2005-03-31
Floyd’s reliance on Gary M.B. is misplaced. In that case, we determined that a defendant did not waive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7419 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Charles F. G.
the case with prejudice, based on his belief that Julie had testified in direct contradiction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5620 - 2017-09-19
the case with prejudice, based on his belief that Julie had testified in direct contradiction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5620 - 2017-09-19