Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6371 - 6380 of 63198 for records.
Search results 6371 - 6380 of 63198 for records.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
in part his request for the return of a security deposit. Based on our review of the briefs and record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=724650 - 2023-11-07
in part his request for the return of a security deposit. Based on our review of the briefs and record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=724650 - 2023-11-07
Stephen W. Jones v. Eleanor Swoboda
Swoboda, is the record custodian at CCI. Jones commenced this action because he was dissatisfied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9673 - 2005-03-31
Swoboda, is the record custodian at CCI. Jones commenced this action because he was dissatisfied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9673 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
. After reviewing the record, counsel’s report, and Lawrence’s response, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96378 - 2013-05-07
. After reviewing the record, counsel’s report, and Lawrence’s response, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96378 - 2013-05-07
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for a family court order. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=798544 - 2024-05-09
for a family court order. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=798544 - 2024-05-09
[PDF]
State v. Titus Graham
. Although Graham had no prior criminal record, the court stated: “The defendant has been found guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6687 - 2017-09-20
. Although Graham had no prior criminal record, the court stated: “The defendant has been found guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6687 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we summarily affirm the judgment, as we discern
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244593 - 2019-08-07
of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we summarily affirm the judgment, as we discern
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244593 - 2019-08-07
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
independent review of the records as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=431749 - 2021-09-28
independent review of the records as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=431749 - 2021-09-28
State v. Estella Marie Iddings
, Iddings’ response, and an independent review of the record, we conclude there is no arguable merit to any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11451 - 2005-03-31
, Iddings’ response, and an independent review of the record, we conclude there is no arguable merit to any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11451 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 17, 2007 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
and his or her counsel, or searching the record “to shed light on the defendant’s understanding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27777 - 2007-01-16
and his or her counsel, or searching the record “to shed light on the defendant’s understanding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27777 - 2007-01-16
[PDF]
State v. Choice W. E.
-1767 -3- We do not believe the record supports that conclusion but is an educated, intuitive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9276 - 2017-09-19
-1767 -3- We do not believe the record supports that conclusion but is an educated, intuitive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9276 - 2017-09-19