Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6371 - 6380 of 7645 for yes.

David C. v. Milwaukee County Department of Human Services
with the trial court that the answer to this question is yes. There is no credible evidence that the aunt's home
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9166 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Richard J. Kenyon
said I’ll allow it counsel. Go ahead. [Defense counsel]: Yes. The terrible, rotten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13075 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Van G. Norwood
on the vagina? A. Yes. We frankly do not see how any reasonable jury would have believed Norwood’s story
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19687 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the required specific findings, this court disagrees. Could this circuit court have made more findings? Yes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=590139 - 2022-11-16

[PDF] State v. Arthur Beiersdorf
?” The court responded, “He will be in prison awhile [sic] but, yes, as a term and condition of probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9012 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Tony M. Smith
agree in these circumstances that the answer is yes: the sentencing hearing would have been different
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8413 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Tony M. Smith
agree in these circumstances that the answer is yes: the sentencing hearing would have been different
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8414 - 2017-09-19

State v. Latrina W.
these extraordinary needs? A Yes, they have really been excellent in following through on my recommendations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7149 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI APP 52
that [he was] already involved in in February of ’06.” Gray answered “yes” to this question. Gray
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48519 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
” in Gutierrez was “distinguishable from the juror’s definitive ‘yes’” in Carter. Gutierrez, 391 Wis. 2d 799
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=896652 - 2025-01-02