Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6381 - 6390 of 12223 for 2012.
Search results 6381 - 6390 of 12223 for 2012.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
in the Saavedras’ response brief. See Apple Hill Farms Dev., LLP v. Price, 2012 WI App 69, ¶14, 342 Wis. 2d 162
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1017718 - 2025-09-30
in the Saavedras’ response brief. See Apple Hill Farms Dev., LLP v. Price, 2012 WI App 69, ¶14, 342 Wis. 2d 162
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1017718 - 2025-09-30
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
forfeiture argument. See State v. Benson, 2012 WI App 101, ¶17, 344 Wis. 2d 126, 822 N.W.2d 484
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175188 - 2017-09-21
forfeiture argument. See State v. Benson, 2012 WI App 101, ¶17, 344 Wis. 2d 126, 822 N.W.2d 484
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175188 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
N.W.2d 771. We generally look for reasons to sustain discretionary decisions. State v. Lock, 2012
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=914981 - 2025-02-19
N.W.2d 771. We generally look for reasons to sustain discretionary decisions. State v. Lock, 2012
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=914981 - 2025-02-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS - CASE LOAD STATISTICS
Percentage 45% 88% 75% 24% 49% * This figure reflects Dec 2012 and YTD Nov 2013 three-judge, one-judge
/ca/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108645 - 2017-09-21
Percentage 45% 88% 75% 24% 49% * This figure reflects Dec 2012 and YTD Nov 2013 three-judge, one-judge
/ca/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108645 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
subdivision in 2012. He acknowledged during his deposition that there was an easement for the walking trail
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=841669 - 2024-08-28
subdivision in 2012. He acknowledged during his deposition that there was an easement for the walking trail
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=841669 - 2024-08-28
CA Blank Order
. There need not be a violation of the law to support an investigative stop. State v. Anagnos, 2012 WI 64, ¶47
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102775 - 2013-10-08
. There need not be a violation of the law to support an investigative stop. State v. Anagnos, 2012 WI 64, ¶47
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102775 - 2013-10-08
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, 2012 WI 91, ¶24, 342 Wis. 2d No. 2023AP1250-CR 3 710, 817 N.W.2d 410. A defendant
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=844636 - 2024-09-04
, 2012 WI 91, ¶24, 342 Wis. 2d No. 2023AP1250-CR 3 710, 817 N.W.2d 410. A defendant
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=844636 - 2024-09-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
judgment entered in December 2012 that awarded Amber primary legal custody and placement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=694679 - 2023-08-30
judgment entered in December 2012 that awarded Amber primary legal custody and placement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=694679 - 2023-08-30
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, 2011); State v. Jones, No. 2011AP2572, unpublished slip op. (WI App Nov. 6, 2012); State v. Jones
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=909757 - 2025-02-04
, 2011); State v. Jones, No. 2011AP2572, unpublished slip op. (WI App Nov. 6, 2012); State v. Jones
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=909757 - 2025-02-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
in the Saavedras’ response brief. See Apple Hill Farms Dev., LLP v. Price, 2012 WI App 69, ¶14, 342 Wis. 2d 162
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1017718 - 2025-09-30
in the Saavedras’ response brief. See Apple Hill Farms Dev., LLP v. Price, 2012 WI App 69, ¶14, 342 Wis. 2d 162
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1017718 - 2025-09-30