Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6381 - 6390 of 69076 for he.
Search results 6381 - 6390 of 69076 for he.
[PDF]
State v. Antonio Valtierrez
and had appeared to be reaching for a weapon when he fired at him. 2 ¶4 Following his conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5517 - 2017-09-19
and had appeared to be reaching for a weapon when he fired at him. 2 ¶4 Following his conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5517 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, he saw two men get into separate vehicles that had been parked near Xiong’s house, then each drive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=982486 - 2025-07-15
, he saw two men get into separate vehicles that had been parked near Xiong’s house, then each drive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=982486 - 2025-07-15
[PDF]
State v. James D. Paulson
§ 350.10(1)(d) and an order denying his reconsideration motion.2 He argues that, as a matter of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3117 - 2017-09-20
§ 350.10(1)(d) and an order denying his reconsideration motion.2 He argues that, as a matter of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3117 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
violent person. He also appeals from an order denying postcommitment relief. On appeal, Schmidt argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=831867 - 2024-07-31
violent person. He also appeals from an order denying postcommitment relief. On appeal, Schmidt argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=831867 - 2024-07-31
COURT OF APPEALS
)(b) (2009-10).[1] He also appeals the orders denying his postconviction motions for plea withdrawal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134242 - 2015-02-02
)(b) (2009-10).[1] He also appeals the orders denying his postconviction motions for plea withdrawal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134242 - 2015-02-02
State v. David S. Frederick
to a prisoner. He argues that the trial court erroneously: (1) concluded that Frederick failed to establish
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13795 - 2005-03-31
to a prisoner. He argues that the trial court erroneously: (1) concluded that Frederick failed to establish
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13795 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
in requesting a weapons frisk. He argues that all evidence resulting from the encounter should have been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30846 - 2007-11-13
in requesting a weapons frisk. He argues that all evidence resulting from the encounter should have been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30846 - 2007-11-13
COURT OF APPEALS
a judgment of conviction, entered after he pled guilty to one count of possession with intent to deliver one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107212 - 2014-01-27
a judgment of conviction, entered after he pled guilty to one count of possession with intent to deliver one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107212 - 2014-01-27
State v. James D. Paulson
reconsideration motion.[2] He argues that, as a matter of law, the evidence was insufficient to support the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3117 - 2005-03-31
reconsideration motion.[2] He argues that, as a matter of law, the evidence was insufficient to support the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3117 - 2005-03-31
State v. Bradley Block
court’s order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial. On appeal, Block argues that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2117 - 2005-03-31
court’s order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial. On appeal, Block argues that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2117 - 2005-03-31