Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6381 - 6390 of 57152 for id.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
of the trial court.’” See id. (citations omitted). To obtain a writ of coram nobis, two necessary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189360 - 2017-09-21

State v. Scott L. Wundrow
officer communicates to the defendant and not the “officers’ unarticulated plan.” See id. Here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6660 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
relevant factors may also be considered. Id. The weight given to these factors is within the court’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=912145 - 2025-02-11

State v. Howard S. Cleaves
with due regard to the facts of the case. Id. An instruction should not be unduly favorable to any party
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4970 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
should be governed by the preference to be accorded to warrants.” Id. at 468-69 (citation omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49247 - 2010-04-27

County of Portage v. William R. Konopacky
judgment; we decide only whether a material factual dispute exists. Id. ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5795 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Donavin Hemphill
.’” Id. at 66. A statement is sufficiently reliable if it fits within a “firmly rooted hearsay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19482 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
review de novo. See id., ¶12. We generally apply United States Supreme Court precedents when we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32517 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Charles R. Seibel
, communicated an incorrect statement of the law or otherwise probably misled the jury. Id. at 59-60. ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6857 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. Robert T. Sankovich
and experience. See id. at 56, 556 N.W.2d at 684. This approach “strikes a balance between individual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12866 - 2017-09-21