Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 63851 - 63860 of 83395 for simple case search.
Search results 63851 - 63860 of 83395 for simple case search.
COURT OF APPEALS
argues that the State called the case an important case for the citizens of the county and the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35378 - 2009-01-28
argues that the State called the case an important case for the citizens of the county and the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35378 - 2009-01-28
COURT OF APPEALS
committed in this case. Any consideration for reduction was really related to the potential of the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108146 - 2014-02-18
committed in this case. Any consideration for reduction was really related to the potential of the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108146 - 2014-02-18
City of Middleton v. James H. Parkin
of appeals must be initiated within 45 days of entry of judgment or order appealed from ...."). In this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10120 - 2005-03-31
of appeals must be initiated within 45 days of entry of judgment or order appealed from ...."). In this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10120 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=993119 - 2025-08-06
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=993119 - 2025-08-06
[PDF]
_WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS
to support a claim of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, or law of the case. Per curiam opinions may
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251120 - 2019-12-06
to support a claim of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, or law of the case. Per curiam opinions may
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251120 - 2019-12-06
COURT OF APPEALS
case details from CCAP for one of J.B.’s cases the day before the revocation hearing. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82617 - 2012-05-16
case details from CCAP for one of J.B.’s cases the day before the revocation hearing. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82617 - 2012-05-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, No. 2021AP1151 2 we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=720888 - 2023-11-01
, No. 2021AP1151 2 we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=720888 - 2023-11-01
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
in open court. In exchange for Voge’s pleas in this case, the State agreed to dismiss and read in five
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208270 - 2018-02-07
in open court. In exchange for Voge’s pleas in this case, the State agreed to dismiss and read in five
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208270 - 2018-02-07
[PDF]
State v. Marika W.
files with this court than she was in this case. Nos. 02-3285 & 02-3286 3 filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5960 - 2017-09-19
files with this court than she was in this case. Nos. 02-3285 & 02-3286 3 filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5960 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 4, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court ...
in “exceptional cases” where the jury was prevented from hearing important testimony that bore on an important
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58522 - 2011-01-03
in “exceptional cases” where the jury was prevented from hearing important testimony that bore on an important
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58522 - 2011-01-03