Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 63861 - 63870 of 83414 for simple case search.

[PDF] WI APP 18
2010 WI APP 18 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2009AP1011
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44818 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of the case includes primarily verbatim Q & A trial testimony, but nonetheless omits relevant evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85592 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Wesley H.
.2d 493 (Ct. App. 1992). In providing the analysis in the instant case, this court is permitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3955 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. Billy R. Davis
, 818–819 (Ct. App. 1995). Whether a defendant establishes a prima facie case is a question of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7187 - 2017-09-20

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED May 24, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court of ...
) the defendant was not negligent in seeking [the] evidence; (3) the evidence is material to an issue in the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64622 - 2011-05-23

Jennifer Switzer v. Jonathan C. Switzer
2006 WI App 10 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2004AP2943 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20739 - 2006-01-24

[PDF] State v. Charles F. G.
the case with prejudice, based on his belief that Julie had testified in direct contradiction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5620 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of appeals that the case be decided by a 3-judge panel.” Sec. 752.31(3). It does not appear that Endries
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=748386 - 2024-01-10

[PDF] State v. Maurice L. Floyd
¶26 Floyd’s reliance on Gary M.B. is misplaced. In that case, we determined that a defendant did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7419 - 2017-09-20

COURT OF APPEALS
to an issue in the case, and (4) the evidence is not merely cumulative. State v. Edmunds, 2008 WI App 33, ¶13
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36404 - 2009-05-12