Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6391 - 6400 of 83494 for case codes/1000.

[PDF] State v. Leopoldo Pequeno
. In this case, Leopoldo Pequeno argues that the statute must be read to also require the State to prove
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6142 - 2017-09-19

Gregory Pik v. David H. Schwarz
by substantial evidence; and (3) that the circuit court should have recused itself from this case. We affirm. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3157 - 2005-03-31

Quintin D. L'Minggio v. Jane Gamble
, rather than habeas corpus, and transferred the case to Dane County in accordance with the venue provision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3654 - 2005-03-31

Joseph E. Sabol v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
that the land was primarily for agricultural use, or that the DOR erred, we affirm. ¶2 This case involves
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7070 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
” for determining child support includes “[a]ll other income, whether taxable or not.” See Wis. Admin. Code § DCF
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75595 - 2013-07-17

[PDF] Quintin D. L'Minggio v. Jane Gamble
as a petition for certiorari, rather than habeas corpus, and transferred the case to Dane County in accordance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3654 - 2017-09-19

State v. John A. Rupp
and a postconviction order for violations of Wis. Admin. Code ch. ATCP § 110.05(2)(d) relating to home improvement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2810 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. John A. Rupp
for violations of WIS. ADMIN. CODE ch. ATCP § 110.05(2)(d) relating to home improvement contracts. Rupp
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2810 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶2 Alston was convicted in three separate cases of two counts of battery, one count of child abuse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111588 - 2017-09-21

State v. Steven C.
permission and this court therefore affirms the order. Facts ¶2 The facts of this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5049 - 2005-03-31